Trial reportFrontiers in public health2022
Web-Based Prediction Models for Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Primary Urachal Carcinoma: A Study Based on SEER Database.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A novel nomogram for adult primary perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and considerations concerning lymph node dissection.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to establish nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with primary urachal carcinoma (UrC). Methods: Information on patients diagnosed with UrC from 1975 to 2018 was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Research Data. The independent prognostic factors were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Backward variable elimination according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) identified the most accurate and parsimonious model. Nomograms were built based on regression coefficients. The C-index, calibration plot, Brier score, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve were used to evaluate the efficiency of models. Results: In total, 236 patients obtained from SEER were divided randomly into training and validation cohorts in a 70:30 ratio (166 and 70 patients, respectively). In the training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that pTNM/Sheldon/Mayo staging systems (included respectively), age, and tumor grade were independent prognostic factors for OS. A similar result was also found in CSS. While other variables, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, did not identify significant correlations. In predicting OS and CSS at 3- and 5- years, the nomograms based on pTNM showed superior discriminative and calibration capabilities in comparison to multiple statistical tools. The C-index values for the training cohort were 0.770 for OS and 0.806 for CSS, and similar outcomes were shown in further internal validation (C-index 0.693 for OS and 0.719 for CSS). We also discovered that the link between age at diagnosis and survival follows a U-shaped curve, indicating that the risk of poor prognosis decreases first and then increases with age. Conclusion: The efficacy of pTNM in predicting the prognosis of patients with UrC was greater than that of the Sheldon and Mayo staging system. Therefore, we recommend pTNM as the preferred system to stage UrC. The novel constructed nomograms based on pTNM, age, and tumor grade showed high accuracy and specificity and could be applied clinically to predict the prognosis of patients with UrC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.