ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Research Methods in a Multinational Business Environment and Implications for Capital Formation: Application of Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag Methods.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explore whether foreign direct investment outflows augment or obstruct public or private capital in developing countries by decomposing domestic capital into private and public capital. While developed countries are the primary source of foreign direct investment outflows (FDIOs), developing economies have become the primary source of FDIO over the past 30 years. We apply cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) methods to overcome the issue of endogeneity and cross-sectional dependency in our dataset. This study analyzes the interaction effects of foreign direct investment and institutional quality (IQ) in promoting aggregate domestic capital formation in developing countries. Our empirical results show that FDI outflows augment private capital formation and additionally, IQ also upsurges private capital formation. Conversely, as per results, FDI outflows obstruct public capital formation, and IQ crowds out public capital formation significantly while private capital crowds out FDI inflows. As per result estimations, we notice that FDIO crowds in private capital formation, thus we conclude that the private sector controls the majority of the sectors for developing countries and the role of the public sector is quite minimal. We conclude that private and public capital possess different attributes; thus clubbing them together might result in aggregation bias. Our result estimations provide several useful policy implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.