Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719458›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2022

Factors Influencing the Decision-making of Healthcare Providers Regarding the Transition of Patients from the Intensive Care Unit to the General Ward in Iran: A Qualitative Study.

Kobra Ghorbanzadeh, Abbas Ebadi, Mohammadali Hosseini, Sadat Seyed Bagher Maddah, Hamidreza Khankeh, Maryam Khoshbakht Pishkhani, Vahid Adiban

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kobra GhorbanzadehDepartment of Nursing, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-1432
Abbas EbadiDepartment of Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Lifestyle Institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-7005
Mohammadali HosseiniDepartment of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-0602
Sadat Seyed Bagher MaddahDepartment of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-1481
Hamidreza KhankehDepartment of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-5646
Maryam Khoshbakht PishkhaniDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2683-599X
Vahid AdibanDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-9369
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRKarolinska University Hospital · SEGuilan University of Medical Sciences · IRLorestan University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The process of making decisions to discharge patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) is very complex and risky, and decisions need to be made under time constraints and based on fair allocation of resources. In this situation, decision-making requires team participation, which is often accompanied by tension and conflict between team members and sometimes family members, which in turn affects patient safety and quality of care. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of physicians and nurses regarding the decision-making process in transition of patients from the ICU to the general ward. Materials and methods: This qualitative study was conducted based on purposive sampling among six nurses and six physicians in Governmental teaching hospitals. The data collection process was conducted from July 2018 to January 2019 through a semistructured interview. Interviews were transcribed and data analysis was accomplished according to the steps proposed by Graneheim and Lundman (2004). Results: Data analysis revealed six themes that reflected factors influencing decision-making in transition of patients from the ICU to the general ward: contingent decision-making, risky decision-making, lack of coherence in team decision-making, differences in clinical judgment, legal and ethical responsibility, and lack of clear criteria. Conclusion: The process of decision-making regarding patient transfer from the ICU is a complex and stressful one. It is affected by situations, team participation, clinical judgment skill, legal issues, and multifactorial challenges. To improve decision-making processes, we need to develop abilities and knowledge and design proper interventions to achieve a principled and correct decision-making process. How to cite this article: Ghorbanzadeh K, Ebadi A, Hosseini M, Maddah SSB, Khankeh H, Pishkhani MK,

Indexed as

Decision-makingIntensive care unitPatientTransition

Identifiers

PMID35719458
PMCPMC9160623
OpenAlexW4225130204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.