ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Effective Doses of Nalbuphine Combined with Propofol in Painless Hysteroscopy.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Different Doses of Esketamine on the Propofol Effect-Site Concentration Required to Suppress Cervical Dilation-Associated Movement During Hysteroscopy: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, Parallel-Group Dose-Response Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Comparison of intravenous nalbuphine and sufentanil on the median effective effect-site concentration of propofol to attenuate the response to cervical dilation during hysteroscopy: a double-blind, dose-response study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Opioid receptor agonist-antagonists in pain management: receptor specific mechanisms, dose response relationships, and clinical combination strategies.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effective Doses of Oliceridine Combined with Propofol for Painless Hysteroscopy: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Determining the Effective Dose of Oliceridine Compounded with Propofol for Painless Hysteroscopy: A Prospective Modified Dixon Sequential Dose-Finding Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- The efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate, ciprofol, and propofol during hysteroscopy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Determining the effective dose of esketamine combined with propofol for painless hysteroscopy: a prospective dose-finding study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Modified Dixon sequential method to determine the effective dose of alfentanil compounded with propofol for day-case hysteroscopy.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Nalbuphine is becoming a common analgesic used in hysteroscopic operations. The aim of this study was to identify the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of nalbuphine combined with propofol in painless hysteroscopy. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients aged 18-60 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of I-II who were scheduled for painless hysteroscopy were recruited. The initial dose of nalbuphine was set at 0.15 mg/kg and varied by 0.01 mg/kg according to the Dixon sequential method. The ED50/ED95 of nalbuphine combined with propofol for hysteroscopy was calculated by the probit method. Results: The ED50 of nalbuphine was 0.122 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.092-0.137) mg/kg, and the ED95 of nalbuphine was 0.153 (95% CI 0.138-0.361) mg/kg. Conclusion: The ED50/ED95 values of nalbuphine combined with propofol in painless hysteroscopy are 0.122 mg/kg and 0.153 mg/kg, respectively. Nalbuphine at 0.153 mg/kg combined with propofol is effective and safe for painless hysteroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.