ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Combining Z-Score and Maternal Copy Number Variation Analysis Increases the Positive Rate and Accuracy in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risks of ignoring uncertainty propagation in AI-augmented security pipelines.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- A retrospective analysis of 6942 amniocentesis cases.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Determining the origin of genome aberrations improves the positive predictive value of NIPT for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pregnancy outcomes of 4,200 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in Henan, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13: Clinical application and accuracy evaluation.PloS one · 2025Article
- NIPT-PG: empowering non-invasive prenatal testing to learn from population genomics through an incremental pan-genomic approach.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Analysis of retest reliability for pregnant women undergoing cfDNA testing with a no-call result.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.