Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Development of a Platelet-Related Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer.

Pengcheng Wang, Wei Zhao, Hailei Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pengcheng WangDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Hailei CaoDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the most common malignancies with high morbidity worldwide. Growing evidence has suggested that platelets are a fundamental component of the tumor microenvironment and play crucial roles in driving tumor biological behavior. The construction of a platelet-related prognostic model that can reliably predict CRC prognosis is of great clinical significance. The 1427 CRC-specific platelet-related genes were collected and mainly enriched in the ribosome and immune-related pathways. Based on platelet-related genes, three subtypes of TCGA CRC samples were identified by consensus clustering and characterized by differences in angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, immune infiltration, and prognosis. A total of 100 prognostic platelet-related genes were identified by univariate Cox regression. LASSO Cox regression further shrank those genes and constructed a 10-gene prognostic model. The patients with higher risk scores had significantly worse disease-specific survival than those with lower scores in both TCGA and validation cohorts. The risk score demonstrated good predictive performance for prognosis by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the risk score was independent of TNM stage, sex, and age, and a graphic nomogram based on the risk score and clinical factors was developed to predict survival probability of CRC patients. Patients from the high-risk group were characterized by higher infiltration of immunosuppressive cells such as MDSC and Treg and higher expression of checkpoints

Indexed as

colorectal cancerplateletprognostic modelsubtypetumor immunity

Identifiers

PMID35719389
PMCPMC9198283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.