Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719201›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022

Lars Plambeck, Frieder Fuchs, Janko Sattler, Axel Hamprecht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MappingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Pivmecillinam.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antimicrobial resistance of clinical Enterobacterales isolates from urine samples, Germany, 2016 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lars PlambeckInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Medical faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-8405
Frieder FuchsInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Medical faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-5378
Janko SattlerInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Medical faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-4169
Axel HamprechtInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Medical faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-5780
University of Cologne · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With increasing resistance to common antibiotics the treatment of urinary tract infections has become challenging and alternative therapeutic options are needed. In the present study, we evaluate the activity of three older and less frequently used antibiotics against MDR Enterobacterales. Methods: Susceptibility of mecillinam, temocillin and nitroxoline was assessed in Enterobacterales isolated from urinary specimens with elevated MICs of third-generation cephalosporins. Susceptibility was determined by the recommended reference MIC methods and additionally by disc diffusion. All isolates were characterized for common β-lactamases by phenotypic and molecular assays. Results: In total 394 Enterobacterales were included. The most common resistance mechanisms were ESBLs ( Conclusions: Mecillinam, temocillin and nitroxoline show good to excellent

Identifiers

PMID35719201
PMCPMC9201239
OpenAlexW4283214329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.