Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719136›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2022

Rapid triage for ischemic stroke: a machine learning-driven approach in the context of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine.

Yulu Zheng, Zheng Guo, Yanbo Zhang, Jianjing Shang, Leilei Yu, Ping Fu, Yizhi Liu, Xingang Li, Hao Wang, Ling Ren and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Yulu Zheng *Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, 6027 Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-8863
Zheng Guo *Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, 6027 Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-4537
Yanbo Zhang *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong China.
Jianjing ShangDongping People's Hospital, Tai'an, Shandong China.
Leilei YuTai'an City Central Hospital, Tai'an, Shandong China.
Ping FuTi'men Township Central Hospital, Tai'an, Shandong China.
Yizhi LiuSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 619 Changcheng Road, Tai'an, 271016 Shandong China.
Xingang LiCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, 6027 Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0252-154X
Hao WangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, National Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9131-0199
Ling RenBeijing United Family Hospital, No.2 Jiangtai Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhangCentre for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Haifeng HouCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, 6027 Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1131-1619
Xuerui TanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong China.
Wei WangCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, 6027 Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1430-1360
Global Health Epidemiology Reference Group (GHERG)
Edith Cowan University · AUCapital Medical University · CNTaian City Central Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University · CNBeijing United Family Hospital · CNBoxing People's Hospital · CNShandong First Medical University · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recognising the early signs of ischemic stroke (IS) in emergency settings has been challenging. Machine learning (ML), a robust tool for predictive, preventive and personalised medicine (PPPM/3PM), presents a possible solution for this issue and produces accurate predictions for real-time data processing. Methods: This investigation evaluated 4999 IS patients among a total of 10,476 adults included in the initial dataset, and 1076 IS subjects among 3935 participants in the external validation dataset. Six ML-based models for the prediction of IS were trained on the initial dataset of 10,476 participants (split participants into a training set [80%] and an internal validation set [20%]). Selected clinical laboratory features routinely assessed at admission were used to inform the models. Model performance was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. Additional techniques-permutation feature importance (PFI), local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-were applied for explaining the black-box ML models. Results: Fifteen routine haematological and biochemical features were selected to establish ML-based models for the prediction of IS. The XGBoost-based model achieved the highest predictive performance, reaching AUCs of 0.91 (0.90-0.92) and 0.92 (0.91-0.93) in the internal and external datasets respectively. PFI globally revealed that demographic feature age, routine haematological parameters, haemoglobin and neutrophil count, and biochemical analytes total protein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were more influential on the model's prediction. LIME and SHAP showed similar local feature attribution explanations. Conclusion: In the context of PPPM/3PM, we used the selected predictors obtained from the results of common blood tests to develop and validate ML-based models for the diagnosis of IS. The XGBoost-based model offers the most accurate prediction. By incorporating the individualised patient profile, this prediction tool is simple and quick to administer. This is promising to support subjective decision making in resource-limited settings or primary care, thereby shortening the time window for the treatment, and improving outcomes after IS. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-022-00283-4.

Indexed as

Disease predictionImproved individual outcomesIschemic strokeMachine learningObjective clinical dataPatients stratificationPredictive preventive and personalised medicine (PPPM/3PM)Targeted prevention

Identifiers

PMID35719136
PMCPMC9203613
OpenAlexW4281702821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.