Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719126›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Anaemia in Indians aged 10-19 years: Prevalence, burden and associated factors at national and regional levels.

Samuel Scott, Anwesha Lahiri, Vani Sethi, Arjan de Wagt, Purnima Menon, Kapil Yadav, Mini Varghese, William Joe, Sheila C Vir, Phuong Hong Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuel ScottInternational Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5564-0510
Anwesha LahiriMRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Vani SethiNutrition Division, UNICEF, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9408-2956
Arjan de WagtNutrition Division, UNICEF, New Delhi, India.
Purnima MenonInternational Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-2894
Kapil YadavCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mini VargheseNutrition International, New Delhi, India.
William JoePopulation Research Centre, Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi, India.
Sheila C VirPublic Health Nutrition and Development Centre, New Delhi, India.
Phuong Hong NguyenInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3418-1674
International Management Institute · INUnited Nations Children's Fund India · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INInstitute of Economic Growth · INInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USNutrition Foundation of India · INUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaemia control programmes in India are hampered by a lack of representative evidence on anaemia prevalence, burden and associated factors for adolescents. The aim of this study was to: (1) describe the national and subnational prevalence, severity and burden of anaemia among Indian adolescents; (2) examine factors associated with anaemia at national and regional levels. Data (n = 14,673 individuals aged 10-19 years) were from India's Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS, 2016-2018). CNNS used a multistage, stratified, probability proportion to size cluster sampling design. Prevalence was estimated using globally comparable age- and sex-specific cutoffs, using survey weights for biomarker sample collection. Burden analysis used prevalence estimates and projected population from 2011 Census data. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse factors (diet, micronutrient deficiencies, haemoglobinopathies, sociodemographic factors, environment) associated with anaemia. Anaemia was present in 40% of girls and 18% of boys, equivalent to 72 million adolescents in 2018, and varied by region (girls 29%-46%; boys 11%-28%) and state (girls 7%-62%; boys 4%-32%). Iron deficiency (ferritin < 15 μg/L) was the strongest predictor of anaemia (odds ratio [OR]: 4.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [3.21,6.83]), followed by haemoglobinopathies (HbA2 > 3.5% or any HbS) (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: [1.66,4.74]), vitamin A deficiency (serum retinol <20 ng/ml) (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: [1.23,2.80]) and zinc deficiency (serum zinc < 70 μg/L) (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: [1.02,1.72]). Regional models show heterogeneity in the strength of association between factors and anaemia by region. Adolescent anaemia control programmes in India should continue to address iron deficiency, strengthen strategies to identify haemoglobinopathies and other micronutrient deficiencies, and further explore geographic variation in associated factors.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyHemoglobinopathiesIron DeficienciesMalnutritionAdolescentChildFemaleFerritinsHumansIndiaMaleMicronutrientsPrevalenceVitamin AZincFerritinsMicronutrientsVitamin AZincadolescentanaemiaIndiamicronutrientspublic health

Identifiers

PMID35719126
PMCPMC9480897
OpenAlexW4283215506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.