Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719017›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

'I knew I'd be taken care of': Exploring patient experiences in the Emergency Department.

Claudia Bull, Sharon Latimer, Julia Crilly, David Spain, Brigid M Gillespie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia BullSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University - Gold Coast campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-652X
Sharon LatimerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University - Logan campus, Logan, Queensland, Australia.
Julia CrillySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University - Gold Coast campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
David SpainGold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Brigid M GillespieSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University - Gold Coast campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-5691
Griffith University · AUGold Coast Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore adult Emergency Department patient experiences to inform the development of a new Emergency Department patient-reported experience measure.

designDescriptive, exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews with adult Emergency Department patients. METHODOLOGY: Participants were recruited across two Emergency Departments in Southeast Queensland, Australia during September and October 2020. Purposive sampling based on maximum variation was used. Participants were recruited during their Emergency Department presentation and interviewed in 2-weeks via telephone. Inductive thematic analysis followed the approach proposed by Braun and Clarke (2012).

resultsThirty participants were interviewed, and four themes were inductively identified: Caring relationships between patients and Emergency Department care providers; Being in the Emergency Department environment; Variations in waiting for care; and Having a companion in the Emergency Department. Caring relationships between patients and Emergency Department care providers included being treated like a person and being cared for, being informed about and included in care, and feeling confident in care providers. Being in the Emergency Department environment included being around other patients, feeling comfortable and having privacy. Variations in waiting for care included expecting a longer wait, waiting throughout the Emergency Department journey and receiving timely care. Having a companion in the Emergency Department included not feeling alone, and observing care providers engage with companions.

conclusionPatient experiences in the Emergency Department are multifaceted, and themes are not mutually exclusive. These findings demonstrate consistency with the core experiential themes identified in the international literature. IMPACT: Strategies to improve patient engagement in shared decision-making, and communication between patients and care providers about wait times will be critical to optimizing Emergency Department patient experiences, and person-centred practice. These findings holistically conceptualize patient experiences in the Emergency Department which is the first step to developing a new Emergency Department patient-reported experience measure.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAustraliaHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentQualitative Researchcommunicationemergency departmentinterviewsnursingpatient experiencequalitative researchrelationshipsshared decision-makingwaiting

Identifiers

PMID35719017
PMCPMC9545035
OpenAlexW4283159499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.