Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35718960›Full record

SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2023

Preclinical Large Animal

Faizus Sazzad, Ramanathan Kollengode, Chan Li Xuan Beverly, Tan Ying Kiat, Geetha Ganesh, Theo Kofidis

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faizus SazzadDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore.
Ramanathan KollengodeDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore.
Chan Li Xuan BeverlyDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore.
Tan Ying KiatDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore.
Geetha GaneshDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore.
Theo KofidisDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore NRF2020NRF-CG001-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of atrioventricular bioprosthesis has witnessed an increasing drive toward clinical translation over the last few decades. A significant challenge in the clinical translation of an atrioventricular bioprosthesis from bench to bedside is the appropriate choice of a large animal model to test the safety and effectiveness of the device.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of pre-clinical in vivo studies that would enable us to synthesize a recommended framework. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses) guidelines were followed to identify and extract relevant articles.

resultsSheep was the most common choice of animal, with nine out of the 12 included studies being conducted on sheep. There were acute and chronic studies based on our search criteria. An average of ~20 and 5 animals were used for chronic and acute studies. One out of three acute studies and eight out of nine chronic studies were on stented heart valve bioprosthesis. All analyses were conducted on the implantation of atrioventricular valves with trileaflet, except for one chronic study on unileaflet valves and one chronic and acute study on bileaflet valves.

conclusionUnderstanding the variance in past pre-clinical study designs may increase the appropriate utilization of large animal models. This synthesized evidence provides a pre-clinical in vivo studies framework for future research on an atrioventricular bioprosthesis.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAnimalsHumansMitral ValveProsthesis DesignSheepatrioventricular valveBioprosthesishydrodynamicin vivolarge animalmitral bioprosthesispre-clinicaltricuspid

Identifiers

PMID35718960
PMCPMC10201874
OpenAlexW4283166874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.