Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35718854›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2022

The Potential Economic Value of Lecanemab in Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease Using Simulation Modeling.

Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Ali Tafazzoli, Ameya Chavan, Weicheng Ye, Quanwu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beyond the Cochrane review: Re-evaluating anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Study partner profile effects on CDR-SB change in anti-amyloid therapy evaluation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The burden of cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Amir Abbas Tahami MonfaredEisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA. Amir_Tahami@eisai.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-3192
Ali TafazzoliEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Ameya ChavanEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Weicheng YeEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Quanwu ZhangEisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
Eisai (United States) · USMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative disease that affects memory, thinking, and behavior and places a substantial economic burden on caregivers and healthcare systems. This early-phase study aimed to model lecanemab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid protofibrils, for patients with early AD, and estimate the potential value-based price (VBP) of lecanemab + standard of care (SoC) compared to SoC alone given an expected product profile of lecanemab informed by data from a phase II trial from payer and societal perspectives using a broad range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds in the USA.

methodsA disease simulation model was used to capture how key AD pathology components relate to the clinical and economic presentation of AD. The effects of disease modification and early intervention on disease progression were simulated on the basis of BAN2401-G000-201 trial data as well as published literature. Model outcomes included patient and caregiver quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total life years, and total care costs including direct medical and non-medical costs for healthcare resource use and indirect costs for caregiving over a lifetime horizon.

resultsLecanemab + SoC was predicted to result in a gain of 0.61 QALYs (societal, 0.64) and a $8707 decrease in total non-treatment costs (societal, $11,214) vs. SoC alone for patients with early AD. For a WTP threshold range of $50,000 to $200,000 per QALY gained, the potential annual VBP of lecanemab was estimated at $9249 (societal, $10,400) to $35,605 (societal, $38,053), respectively. Other patient subsets, treatment stopping rules, and dosing regimens were used to assess the sensitivity of the VBP estimates.

conclusionThe early model predicted that lecanemab would potentially improve long-term health outcomes and reduce formal and informal care costs, resulting in a range of VBPs that reflect the value of lecanemab to society.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid plaquesCost-effectivenessDisease-modifying therapyInstitutionalizationLecanemabLife yearsQuality-adjusted life yearsSimulationValue-based price

Identifiers

PMID35718854
PMCPMC9338185
OpenAlexW4283159318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.