Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35718838›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2022

Internal jugular vein ultrasound for the diagnosis of hypovolemia and hypervolemia in acutely ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Michael Ke Wang, Joshua Piticaru, Coralea Kappel, Michael Mikhaeil, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Bram Rochwerg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07411313 (The Role of Internal Jugular Vein Ultrasonography in Predicting Hypotension in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07411313 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Internal Jugular Vein Ultrasonography in Predicting Hypotension in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study (Protocol ID: 2023-12/509)

TypeobservationalSponsorDr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled85ConditionsSpinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension, Geriatric, Internal Jugular Vein, UltrasonographyArmsNot applicable- observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael Ke WangDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. wangm7@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-3235
Joshua PiticaruDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Coralea KappelDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Michael MikhaeilDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Lawrence MbuagbawDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
McMaster University · CAImpact · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CAStellenbosch University · ZASt Joseph's Hospital Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate volume status assessments allow physicians to rapidly implement therapeutic measures in acutely unwell patients. However, existing bedside diagnostic tools are often unreliable for assessing intravascular volume. We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for English language articles without date restrictions on January 20, 2022. Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of IJV-US for hypovolemia and/or hypervolemia in an acute care setting were screened for inclusion. We included studies using any method of IJV-US assessment as the index test, compared against any reference standard. We fitted hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, separately for hypovolemia and hypervolemia. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. We assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. A total of 26 studies were included, of which 19 studies (956 patients) examined IJV-US for hypovolemia and 13 studies (672 patients) examined IJV-US for hypervolemia. For the diagnosis of hypovolemia, IJV-US had a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.87; moderate-certainty evidence) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Measurement of IJV collapsibility indices had higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.89; specificity 0.78, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88) than static IJV indices (sensitivity 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.82; specificity 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86). For the diagnosis of hypervolemia, IJV-US had a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.92; moderate-certainty evidence) and specificity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.82; very low-certainty evidence). IJV-US has moderate sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of hypervolemia and hypovolemia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the role of IJV-US for guiding therapeutic interventions aimed at optimizing volume status.

Indexed as

HypovolemiaJugular VeinsUltrasonographyAdultHumansROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBedside ultrasoundHypervolemiaHypovolemiaPocusVolume status

Identifiers

PMID35718838
OpenAlexW4283155530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.