Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35718774›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022

What are the odds? Identifying factors related to competitive success in powerlifting.

Daniel J van den Hoek, Patrick J Owen, Joel M Garrett, Robert J Howells, Joshua Pearson, Jemima G Spathis, Christopher Latella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel J van den HoekSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia. daniel.vandenhoek@acu.edu.au.
Patrick J OwenInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Joel M GarrettSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Robert J HowellsSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Joshua PearsonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Jemima G SpathisSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Christopher LatellaSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Human Performance, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability for athletes to gain a competitive advantage over their opponents is well recognised. At times, this advantage may be considered a marginal gain. However, in the context of competition, marginal advantages may be the difference between winning and losing. This investigation explores how competition factors influence the odds of competitive success (i.e. winning) in powerlifting (PL) to assist athletes and coaches in achieving a competitive advantage.

methodsA cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of competition data from raw/classic, Australian powerlifting competitions 2010-2019 was conducted. Data included 10,599 competition entries (males: n = 6567 [62%], females: n = 4032 [38%]). Independent t-tests were used to compare continuous data between sexes or winners and non-winners at an event. Cohen's d and the 95% confidence interval (d [95% CI]) were calculated. Univariate odds of winning an event based on independent variables (age [irrespective of category], sex, body weight and weight of first lift attempt [regardless of success]), were assessed by separate simple logistic regression.

resultsWhen compared to males, the odds of winning for females were 50% greater (OR [95% CI] 1.500 [1.384, 1.625]; P < 0.001). Athletes who had larger first lift attempts (Squat: + 7.0 kg P < 0.001, Bench Press: + 3.2 kg P < 0.001, and Deadlift: + 6.1 kg P < 0.001and competed for a longer period (winners: 401 vs non-winners: 304 days, P < 0.001) had an increased likelihood winning. Age was associated with increased odds of success for males (OR [95% CI] 1.014 [1.009, 1.019], P < 0.001) per additional year of age for males, but not females (P = 0.509).

conclusionsMultiple factors appear to contribute to the likelihood of winning a PL competition. These results may help coaches to develop competition and training strategies that optimise athletes' likelihood of competitive success in PL.

Indexed as

Athletic performanceBench pressCompetitive successDeadliftSquatStrength sport

Identifiers

PMID35718774
PMCPMC9206735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.