Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35718772›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Genetics education in primary care residency training: satisfaction and current barriers.

Nadia Falah, Amna Umer, Emilea Warnick, Manuel Vallejo, Timothy Lefeber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadia FalahDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics, 1 Medical Center Drive, West Virginia Medicine Children's Hospital, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. falahnadia@gmail.com.
Amna UmerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics, 1 Medical Center Drive, West Virginia Medicine Children's Hospital, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Emilea WarnickDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics, 1 Medical Center Drive, West Virginia Medicine Children's Hospital, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Manuel VallejoGraduate Medical Education, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Timothy LefeberDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics, 1 Medical Center Drive, West Virginia Medicine Children's Hospital, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetics education can be integrated into general care medicine through primary care residency programs. A study of primary care residents was done to evaluate quality, satisfaction, and barriers in genetics education in residency training programs. Thus, providing more evidence for the necessity for its development and progress.

methodsA cross-sectional descriptive self-administered questionnaire survey was delivered to four primary care West Virginia University (WVU) residency training programs in 2020-2021. The anonymous 14-item survey included the following questionnaire domains: general data, genetics training satisfaction, and genetics education barriers.

resultsThe survey response rate was 52% (70/123) and 59 participants completed the survey. Overall, respondents viewed genetic education as critical to their chosen specialty (90%). Trainees at all educational levels obtained their education mostly from class based educational curricula (77% from lectures, 65% from didactic and 49% from grand rounds). The majority of survey respondents indicated insufficient experience with genetic patient care (34% ward genetic consultation, 5% clinic experience, 0% genetic department rotation). The percentage of residents who were satisfied with genetic topics were as follows: basic genetics (57%), capturing family history (82%), initiating basic genetic workup (15%), a basic understanding of the genetic report (23%), basic management surveillance in the genetic patient (18%), understanding the genetic referral and explaining it to a patient (47%). Residents reported barriers to genetic interest included complexity of the field (87%), followed by limited utility of genetics testing (41%). The most common suggestions for improving the genetic education component were to provide more lectures (61%), followed by enhanced advertisement of genetic education resources specifically rotations in the genetics department (22%). Other suggestions include the integration of genetic education in inpatient learning (20%) and providing research experience (7%).

conclusionPrimary care residents were satisfied with their genetic knowledge in the classroom and stated a clear need for enhanced hands-on clinical skills and research experience in their current residency training. The survey suggestions for improvement can enhance primary care residents' genetic training that can lead to advances in rare disease recognition, precision medicine, and improve access to genetics testing.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumHumansPersonal SatisfactionPrimary Health CareGenetics educationPersonalized MedicinePrecision MedicinePrimary CareRare DiseaseResidency

Identifiers

PMID35718772
PMCPMC9208192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.