Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35718762›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

Protocol for a scoping review of sepsis epidemiology.

M Elizabeth Wilcox, Marietou Daou, Joanna C Dionne, Peter Dodek, Marina Englesakis, Allan Garland, Claire Lauzon, Osama Loubani, Bram Rochwerg, Manu Shankar-Hari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

M Elizabeth WilcoxDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. elizabeth.wilcox@utoronto.ca.
Marietou DaouDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joanna C DionneDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Peter DodekDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marina EnglesakisLibrary & Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Allan GarlandProfessor of Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Claire LauzonDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Osama LoubaniDepartments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Manu Shankar-HariChair of Translational Critical Care Medicine, Centre for Inflammation Research, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kednapa ThavornSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Andrea C TriccoLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is a common, life-threatening syndrome of physiologic, pathologic, and biochemical abnormalities that are caused by infection and propagated by a dysregulated immune response. In 2017, the estimated annual incidence of sepsis around the world was 508 cases per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 422-612 cases per 100,000), however, reported incidence rates vary significantly by country. A scoping review will identify knowledge gaps by systematically investigating the incidence of sepsis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be guided by the updated JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) methodology. We will search the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews/Central Register of Controlled Trials. In addition, we will search websites of trial and study registries. We will review titles and abstracts of potentially eligible studies and then full-texts by two independent reviewers. We will include any study that is focused on the incidence of sepsis or septic shock in any population. Data will be abstracted independently using pre-piloted data extraction forms, and we will present results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this review will be used to create a publicly available indexed and searchable electronic registry of existing sepsis research relating to incidence in neonates, children, and adults. With input from stakeholders, we will identify the implications of study findings for policy, practice, and research. Ethics approval was not required given this study reports on existing literature.

Indexed as

SepsisAdultChildHumansInfant, NewbornRegistriesScoping Reviews as TopicInfectionOrgan failureScoping reviewSepsisSequential Organ Failure AssessmentSystemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35718762
PMCPMC9208121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.