Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35717627›Full record

SynthesisHealth & social care in the community2022

The impact of the COVID pandemic on working age adults with disability: Meta-analysis of evidence from four national surveys.

Eric Emerson, Zoe Aitken, Vaso Totsika, Tania King, Roger J Stancliffe, Chris Hatton, Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Richard P Hastings, Anne Kavanagh

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric EmersonCentre for Disability Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-6032
Zoe AitkenCentre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vaso TotsikaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Tania KingDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roger J StancliffeCentre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris HattonDepartment of Social Care and Social Work, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Gwynnyth LlewellynCentre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Richard P HastingsCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Anne KavanaghCentre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concern has been expressed about the extent to which people with disabilities may be particularly vulnerable to negative impacts of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. However, to date little published research has attempted to characterise or quantify the risks faced by people with/without disabilities in relation to COVID-19. We sought to compare the impact of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated government responses among working age adults with and without disabilities in the UK on; COVID-19 outcomes, health and wellbeing, employment and financial security, health behaviours, and conflict and trust. We undertook secondary analysis of data collected in four UK longitudinal surveys; the Millennium Cohort Study, Next Steps, the British Cohort Study and the National Child Development Study. Combining analyses across surveys with random effects meta-analysis, there was evidence that people with disabilities were significantly more likely to report having had COVID-19 and had significantly increased levels of stress, less exercise, poorer sleep patterns, more conflict with their partner and others in their local area, and to have less trust in the government. While most outcomes did not differ significantly between participants with and without disability, the findings suggest that in the early days of COVID-19 a detrimental impact emerges for those with disabilities which is more pronounced among older people with disabilities. Future research is needed to determine the longer-term impact of the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesAdultAgedChildCohort StudiesEmploymentHumansPandemicsadultsconflictCOVID-19disabilitystresstrustwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35717627
PMCPMC9349993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.