ArticlePsychophysiology2022
Data-driven approach for automatic detection of aortic valve opening: B point detection from impedance cardiogram.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation study on cuffless ambulatory blood pressure monitoring method using bio-impedance, impedance cardiography and electrocardiography.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Multi-Signal Acquisition System for Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An open-access simultaneous electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram database.Physiological measurement · 2024Article
- Impedance cardiogram based exploration of cardiac mechanisms in post-traumatic stress disorder during trauma recall.Psychophysiology · 2024Article
- An Effective Method of Detecting Characteristic Points of Impedance Cardiogram Verified in the Clinical Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Validation of a new impedance cardiography analysis algorithm for clinical classification of stress states.Psychophysiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-ejection period (PEP), an indicator of sympathetic nervous system activity, is useful in psychophysiology and cardiovascular studies. Accurate PEP measurement is challenging and relies on robust identification of the timing of aortic valve opening, marked as the B point on impedance cardiogram (ICG) signals. The ICG sensitivity to noise and its waveform's morphological variability makes automated B point detection difficult, requiring inefficient and cumbersome expert visual annotation. In this article, we propose a machine learning-based automated algorithm to detect the aortic valve opening for PEP measurement, which is robust against noise and ICG morphological variations. We analyzed over 60 hr of synchronized ECG and ICG records from 189 subjects. A total of 3657 averaged beats were formed using our recently developed ICG noise removal algorithm. Features such as the averaged ICG waveform, its first and second derivatives, as well as high-level morphological and critical hemodynamic parameters were extracted and fed into the regression algorithms to estimate the B point location. The morphological features were extracted from our proposed "variable" physiologically valid search-window related to diverse B point shapes. A subject-wise nested cross-validation procedure was performed for parameter tuning and model assessment. After examining multiple regression models, Adaboost was selected, which demonstrated superior performance and higher robustness to five state-of-the-art algorithms that were evaluated in terms of low mean absolute error of 3.5 ms, low median absolute error of 0.0 ms, high correlation with experts' estimates (Pearson coefficient = 0.9), and low standard deviation of errors of 9.2 ms. For reproducibility, an open-source toolbox is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.