ArticleMedical physics2022
POD-Kalman filtering for improving noninvasive 3D temperature monitoring in MR-guided hyperthermia.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roadmap towards personalized approaches and safety considerations in non-ionizing radiation: from dosimetry to therapeutic and diagnostic applications.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Magnetic resonance thermometry in the target volume versus intraluminal probe thermometry for hyperthermia treatment monitoring.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Real-time 3D temperature reconstruction in microwave cancer hyperthermia from scarce temperature measurements.Nature communications · 2025Article
- POD-Kalman filtering for improving noninvasive 3D temperature monitoring in MR-guided hyperthermia.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring resonance frequency (RF) hyperthermia treatment, the temperature of the tumor tissue is elevated to the range of 39-44°C. Accurate temperature monitoring is essential to guide treatments and ensure precise heat delivery and treatment quality. Magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry is currently the only clinical method to measure temperature noninvasively in a volume during treatment. However, several studies have shown that this approach is not always sufficiently accurate for thermal dosimetry in areas with motion, such as the pelvic region. Model-based temperature estimation is a promising approach to correct and supplement 3D online temperature estimation in regions where MR thermometry is unreliable or cannot be measured. However, complete 3D temperature modeling of the pelvic region is too complex for online usage. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the use of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) model reduction combined with Kalman filtering to improve temperature estimation using MR thermometry. Furthermore, we assessed the benefit of this method using data from hyperthermia treatment where there were limited and unreliable MR thermometry measurements.
methodsThe performance of POD-Kalman filtering was evaluated in several heating experiments and for data from patients treated for locally advanced cervical cancer. For each method, we evaluated the mean absolute error (MAE) concerning the temperature measurements acquired by the thermal probes, and we assessed the reproducibility and consistency using the standard deviation of error (SDE). Furthermore, three patient groups were defined according to susceptibility artifacts caused by the level of intestinal gas motion to assess if the POD-Kalman filtering could compensate for missing and unreliable MR thermometry measurements.
resultsFirst, we showed that this method is beneficial and reproducible in phantom experiments. Second, we demonstrated that the combined method improved the match between temperature prediction and temperature acquired by intraluminal thermometry for patients treated for locally advanced cervical cancer. Considering all patients, the POD-Kalman filter improved MAE by 43% (filtered MR thermometry = 1.29°C, POD-Kalman filtered temperature = 0.74°C). Moreover, the SDE was improved by 47% (filtered MR thermometry = 1.16°C, POD-Kalman filtered temperature = 0.61°C). Specifically, the POD-Kalman filter reduced the MAE by approximately 60% in patients whose MR thermometry was unreliable because of the great amount of susceptibilities caused by the high level of intestinal gas motion.
conclusionsWe showed that the POD-Kalman filter significantly improved the accuracy of temperature monitoring compared to MR thermometry in heating experiments and hyperthermia treatments. The results demonstrated that POD-Kalman filtering can improve thermal dosimetry during RF hyperthermia treatment, especially when MR thermometry is inaccurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.