Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35717573›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2022

Embryo cryopreservation leads to sex-specific DNA methylation perturbations in both human and mouse placentas.

Sneha Mani, Jayashri Ghosh, Eric A Rhon-Calderon, Yemin Lan, Teri Ord, Charikleia Kalliora, Joe Chan, Bryant Schultz, Elaine Vaughan-Williams, Christos Coutifaris and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Ultra-low oxygen tension duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cryopreservation, cryoprotectants, and potential risk of epigenetic alteration.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sneha ManiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jayashri GhoshCancer and Cellular Biology, Fels Cancer Institute for Personalized Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Eric A Rhon-CalderonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Yemin LanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Teri OrdDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Charikleia KallioraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Joe ChanCancer and Cellular Biology, Fels Cancer Institute for Personalized Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Bryant SchultzCancer and Cellular Biology, Fels Cancer Institute for Personalized Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Elaine Vaughan-WilliamsCancer and Cellular Biology, Fels Cancer Institute for Personalized Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Christos CoutifarisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Carmen SapienzaCancer and Cellular Biology, Fels Cancer Institute for Personalized Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Suneeta SenapatiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Marisa S BartolomeiCenter for Research on Reproduction and Women's Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Monica MainigiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3306-4791
University of Pennsylvania · USTemple University · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Research Project 4: Epigenetic Regulation of Retrotransposon Silencing and Male Fertility in the MouseP50HD068157 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MONICA AILAWADI MAINIGI · 2014 to 2026
$16.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD068157NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is associated with DNA methylation abnormalities and a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, which exposure(s), among the many IVF interventions, contributes to these outcomes remains unknown. Frozen embryo transfer (ET) is increasingly utilized as an alternative to fresh ET, but reports suggest a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia and large for gestational age infants. This study examines DNA methylation in human placentas using the 850K Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array obtained after 65 programmed frozen ET cycles, 82 fresh ET cycles and 45 unassisted conceptions. Nine patients provided placentas following frozen and fresh ET from consecutive pregnancies for a paired subgroup analysis. In parallel, eight mouse placentas from fresh and frozen ET were analyzed using the Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip array. Human and mouse placentas were significantly hypermethylated after frozen ET compared with fresh. Paired analysis showed similar trends. Sex-specific analysis revealed that these changes were driven by male placentas in humans and mice. Frozen and fresh ET placentas were significantly different from controls, with frozen samples hypermethylated compared with controls driven by males and fresh samples being hypomethylated compared with controls, driven by females. Sexually dimorphic epigenetic changes could indicate differential susceptibility to IVF-associated perturbations, which highlights the importance of sex-specific evaluation of adverse outcomes. Similarities between changes in mice and humans underscore the suitability of the mouse model in evaluating how IVF impacts the epigenetic landscape, which is valuable given limited access to human tissue and the ability to isolate specific interventions in mice.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEmbryo TransferAnimalsCryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMicePlacentaPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35717573
PMCPMC9652110
OpenAlexW4283122600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.