Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35717341›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery & related research2022

Are there avoidable causes of early revision total knee arthroplasty?

Mackenzie A Roof, Jason B Kreinces, Ran Schwarzkopf, Joshua C Rozell, Vinay K Aggarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery & related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparable clinical outcomes in functionally aligned computer-assisted and image-based robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Total knee arthroplasty and periprosthetic distal femoral fracture: looking beyond the osteoporosis to previous osteoporotic fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mackenzie A RoofDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 462 First Ave (BHC), CD Bldg Room 4-85, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3586-4143
Jason B KreincesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 462 First Ave (BHC), CD Bldg Room 4-85, New York, NY, USA.
Ran SchwarzkopfDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 462 First Ave (BHC), CD Bldg Room 4-85, New York, NY, USA.
Joshua C RozellDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 462 First Ave (BHC), CD Bldg Room 4-85, New York, NY, USA.
Vinay K AggarwalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 462 First Ave (BHC), CD Bldg Room 4-85, New York, NY, USA. Vinay.Aggarwal@nyulangone.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgeons can improve their practice by understanding potentially avoidable reasons for early revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study is to describe potentially avoidable indications for rTKA within 5 years of the index procedure.

methodsThis retrospective observational analysis utilized the rTKA database at a large, academic orthopedic specialty hospital to identify 167 consecutive rTKA from 2014 to 2019 performed within 5 years after primary TKA (pTKA). Two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons reviewed the cases to classify them as potentially avoidable or unavoidable. Unavoidable indications for rTKA included infection/wound complication, arthrofibrosis, instability due to underlying collagen disease or significant weight loss, and any traumatic event leading to pTKA failure. Potentially avoidable indications included atraumatic instability, intraoperative fracture, metal allergy, and atraumatic patellar instability or maltracking. Aseptic loosening was considered avoidable if it occurred in the presence of component malpositioning or poor cementation technique.

resultsThere were 112 (67.1%) unavoidable cases and 55 avoidable cases (32.9%). Of the unavoidable cases, there were 68 rTKA for infection or wound complications (60.7%), 23 for arthrofibrosis (20.5%), 6 for instability (5.4%), 6 for postoperative fracture (5.4%), 6 for aseptic loosening (5.4%), and 3 for extensor mechanism pathology following trauma (2.6%). Of the potentially avoidable rTKA, 24 were for aseptic loosening (43.7%), 23 for atraumatic instability (41.8%), 6 for atraumatic extensor mechanism pathology (10.9%), 1 for nickel allergy (1.8%), and 1 for intraoperative fracture (1.8%).

conclusionThese findings indicate that over 30% of early rTKA are potentially avoidable. Interventions should focus on addressing potentially avoidable causes such as short-term aseptic loosening and instability to reduce the need for costly and resource-intensive rTKA. Level of evidence III, retrospective observational analysis.

Indexed as

AvoidableComplicationsRevision total knee arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyUnavoidable

Identifiers

PMID35717341
PMCPMC9206343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.