Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35717324›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2022

Pleural mesothelioma risk by industry and occupation: results from the Multicentre Italian Study on the Etiology of Mesothelioma (MISEM).

Enrica Migliore, Dario Consonni, Susan Peters, Roel C H Vermeulen, Hans Kromhout, Antonio Baldassarre, Domenica Cavone, Elisabetta Chellini, Corrado Magnani, Carolina Mensi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Laying the Foundation for a Mesothelioma Patient Registry: Development of Data Collection Tools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrica MiglioreCancer Epidemiology Unit, CPO Piemonte and University of Turin, Turin, Italy. enrica.migliore@cpo.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0121-6295
Dario ConsonniOccupational Health Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Susan PetersDepartment of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roel C H VermeulenDepartment of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans KromhoutDepartment of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antonio BaldassarreOccupational Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Domenica CavoneInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Elisabetta ChelliniUnit of Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
Corrado MagnaniInterdepartmental Centre G. Scansetti for Studies On Asbestos and Other Toxic Particulates, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Carolina MensiOccupational Health Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Enzo MerlerOccupational Health Unit, Department of Prevention, Padua, Italy.
Marina MustiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alessandro MarinaccioUnit of Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology - Italian Mesothelioma Register, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
Dario MirabelliCancer Epidemiology Unit, CPO Piemonte and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITUtrecht University · NLFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Italian mesothelioma registry (ReNaM) estimates mesothelioma incidence and addresses its etiology by assessing cases' exposures but cannot provide relative risk estimates.

objectivesi) To estimate pleural mesothelioma relative risk by industry and occupation and by ReNaM categories of asbestos exposure; and ii) to provide quantitative estimates of the exposure-response relationship.

methodsA population-based mesothelioma case-control study was conducted in 2012-2014 in five Italian regions. Cases and age and gender frequency-matched controls were interviewed using a standard ReNaM questionnaire. Experts coded work histories according to international standard classifications of industries/occupations and assigned asbestos exposure according to ReNaM categories. Job codes were further linked to SYN-JEM, a quantitative job-exposure matrix. Cumulative exposure (CE, f/mL-years) was computed by summing individual exposures over lifetime work history. Unconditional logistic regression analyses adjusted by gender, centre and age were fitted to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsAmong men we observed increased risks of mesothelioma in many industries and associated occupations, including: asbestos-cement (OR = 3.43), manufacture of railroad equipment (OR = 8.07), shipbuilding and repairing (OR = 2.34), iron and steel mills (OR = 2.15), and construction (OR = 1.94). ORs by ReNaM exposure categories were as follows: definite/probable occupational exposure (OR = 15.8, men; OR = 8.80, women), possible occupational (OR = 2.82, men; OR = 3.70, women), sharing home with an exposed worker (OR = 2.55, men; OR = 10.3, women), residential (OR = 2.14, men; OR = 3.24, women). Based on SYN-JEM, mesothelioma risk increased by almost 30% per f/mL-year (OR = 1.28, CI 1.16-1.42).

conclusionsOut study involved five regions with historically different types and levels of industrial development, encompassing one third of the Italian population and half of Italian mesothelioma cases. As expected, we found increased pleural mesothelioma risk in the asbestos industry and in trades with large consumption of asbestos materials. Clear associations were found using both qualitative (ReNaM classifications) and quantitative estimates (using SYN-JEM) of past asbestos exposure, with clear evidence of an exposure-response relationship.

Indexed as

AsbestosMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePleural NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleOccupationsAsbestosAsbestosCase–control studyExposure assessmentOccupational exposurePleural mesothelioma

Identifiers

PMID35717324
PMCPMC9206310
OpenAlexW4283073212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.