Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35717309›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen2022

[Long COVID: Care and support needs from the perspective of "long-haul" patients and primary care practitioners - a mixed-methods study from Baden-Wuerttemberg].

Sandra Stengel, Mariell Hoffmann, Jan Koetsenruijter, Frank Peters-Klimm, Michel Wensing, Uta Merle, Joachim Szecsenyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [An insight into the long/post COVID care situation in Germany-a rapid scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Outpatient Long/Post-COVID Care: Barriers and Desires of Affected Persons to Medical Care].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra StengelUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung. Marsilius Arkaden, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Electronic address: sandra.stengel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Mariell HoffmannUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung. Marsilius Arkaden, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Jan KoetsenruijterUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung. Marsilius Arkaden, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Frank Peters-KlimmUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung. Marsilius Arkaden, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Michel WensingUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung. Marsilius Arkaden, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Uta MerleUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektionskrankheiten, Vergiftungen, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Joachim SzecsenyiUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung. Marsilius Arkaden, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe approaches to cope with the challenges of providing medical care to patients with symptoms of long COVID are multidisciplinary and involve primary care worldwide. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and ideas for continued development of medical care of long COVID from the patients' (PAT) and primary care practitioners' (PCP) perspective.

methodsBetween the third and fourth COVID-19 wave in Germany (July to September 2021), a mixed methods study was conducted by inviting patients and PCPs in two neighboring districts (urban and rural) in Baden-Wuerttemberg to a paper-based questionnaire with both closed and open questions. On the part of the PCPs a written, anonymized, complete survey was conducted, on the part of symptomatic COVID long-haulers an anonymized online survey with announcement of the study by multiple recruiting processes. Qualitative content analysis was applied to free text entries. The quantitative results were analyzed mainly descriptively.

resultsThe responses of n = 72 PCPs (response rate 12%) and n = 126 PAT showed a heterogeneous assessment regarding the satisfaction with medical care for long COVID as well as the perception of the attitude towards patients and their disease in both groups. Uncertainty and dealing with it played a relevant role in both groups as well. The professional medical knowledge was assessed by 3,1 (self-assessment PCPs) and 3,2 (PAT) on average using a five-point Likert scale (1 = not applicable; 5 = applicable). The request for a structured overall concept with competent contact points and coordination of medical care for long COVID patients emerged out of the statements of both groups.

conclusionThe results support an interdisciplinary, intersectoral and interprofessional stepped-care concept for long COVID in Germany with PCPs as the first contact persons, integration of specialized contact points and knowledge transfer. Therefore, it appears to be both reasonable and appropriate to establish regional networks with links between regional outpatient medical care structures and the university medical sector.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ambulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelGermanyHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePrimary Health CareDeutschlandGermanyLong COVIDLong-COVIDMedical careMedizinische VersorgungPatient*innenPrimärversorgungPrimary care patientsPrimary care practitioners

Identifiers

PMID35717309
PMCPMC9212842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.