ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Utilization of MRI in surgical decision making in the shoulder.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A worldwide cross-sectional survey seeks the current global practice patterns on perioperative management in elective shoulder replacement surgery.JSES international · 2026Article
- Article
- Utilization trends for MR arthrography of the hip and shoulder: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 20-year data from a tertiary care academic medical center.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers: can ChatGPT compete with a shoulder and elbow specialist in diagnosis and management?JSES international · 2023Article
- The Number of Surgeons Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Repair Is Declining.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Anchorless Labral Repair for Recurrent Shoulder Instability in the Skeletally Immature.Arthroscopy techniques · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate both the utility of MRI scans and reports used in the current practice routine of shoulder surgeons and their surgical decision-making process.
methodsNinety-three shoulder-specialised orthopaedic surgeons of the Canadian Shoulder and Elbow Society (CSES) Orthopaedic Association were surveyed in 2020 anonymously online to help identify the use of MR-imaging and reports in managing shoulder disorders and surgical decision process.
resultsThirty out of 93 (32.25%) CSES fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons participated. Respondents request MRI scans in about 55% of rotator cuff (RC) pathology and 48% of shoulder instability cases. Fifty percent of patients with potential RC pathology arrive with a completed MRI scan prior first orthopaedic consult. Their surgical decision is primarily based on patient history (45-55%) and physical examination (23-42%) followed by MRI scan review (2.6-18%), reading MRI reports (0-1.6%) or viewing other imaging (3-23%) depending on the shoulder disease. Ninety percent of surgeons would not decide on surgery in ambiguous cases unless the MR-images were personally reviewed. Respondents stated that shoulder MRI scans are ordered too frequently prior specialist visit as identified in more than 50% of cases depending on pathology.
conclusionsThe decision-making process for shoulder surgery depends on the underlying pathology and patient history. The results demonstrate that orthopaedic surgeons are comfortable reviewing shoulder MRI scans without necessarily reading the MRI report prior to a surgical decision. MRI scans are becoming an increasingly important part of surgical management in shoulder pathologies but should not be used without assessment of patient history and or physical examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.