Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35717164›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a midwifery survey into attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine.

Funlayo Odejinmi, Rebecca Mallick, Christina Neophytou, Kade Mondeh, Megan Hall, Claire Scrivener, Katie Tibble, Mary Turay-Olusile, Nandita Deo, Doreen Oforiwaa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence, nature, and determinants of COVID-19-related conspiracy theories among healthcare workers: a scoping review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Funlayo OdejinmiWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E11 1NR, UK.
Rebecca MallickPrincess Royal Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Lewes Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 4EX, UK.
Christina NeophytouWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E11 1NR, UK.
Kade MondehNewham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Glen Rd, London, E13 8S, UK.
Megan HallNewham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Glen Rd, London, E13 8S, UK.
Claire ScrivenerPrincess Royal Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Lewes Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 4EX, UK. Clairescrivener@doctors.org.uk.
Katie TibblePrincess Royal Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Lewes Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 4EX, UK.
Mary Turay-OlusileWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E11 1NR, UK.
Nandita DeoWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E11 1NR, UK.
Doreen OforiwaaWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E11 1NR, UK.
Rita OsayimwenWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E11 1NR, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBPrincess Royal Hospital · GBWhipps Cross University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthnically minoritised people have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging evidence suggests a lower uptake of the vaccine in ethnically minoritised people, particularly Black females of reproductive age. Unvaccinated pregnant women are high risk for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Midwives are the principal healthcare professionals responsible for counselling the pregnant population on decisions relating to vaccine uptake. The aim of this study was to explore midwifery uptake of and attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine in two ethnically diverse areas.

methodsA 45-point questionnaire was circulated over a six-week period to midwives employed in two teaching hospitals in England; London (Barts Health NHS Trust) and Sussex (Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (BSUH)). A total of 378 out of 868 midwives responded. Results were analysed to determine vaccine uptake as well as factors influencing vaccine hesitancy and decision-making between the two trusts and ethnic groups. Thematic analysis was also undertaken.

resultsMidwives of Black ethnicities were over 4-times less likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine compared to midwives of White ethnicities (52% vs 85%, adjusted OR = 0.22, p = < 0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences between trusts in receipt of the COVID-19 vaccine (p = 0.13). Midwives at Barts Health were significantly more likely to have tested positive for COVID-19 compared to midwives at BSUH (adjusted OR = 2.55, p = 0.007). There was no statistical difference between ethnicities in testing positive for COVID-19 (p = 0.86). The most common concerns amongst all participants were regarding the long-term effect of the vaccine (35%), that it was developed too fast (24%), having an allergic reaction (22%) and concerns about fertility (15%). Amongst unvaccinated midwives, those of Black ethnicity had a higher occurrence of concern that the vaccine contained meat / porcine products (adjusted OR = 5.93, p = 0.04) and that the vaccine would have an adverse effect on ethnic minorities (adjusted OR = 4.42, p = 0.03).

conclusionThis study highlights the significantly higher level of vaccine hesitancy amongst Black midwives and offer insights into midwives' concerns. This can facilitate future targeted public health interventions. It is essential that vaccine hesitancy amongst midwifery staff is addressed to improve vaccine uptake in the pregnant population.

Indexed as

COVID-19MidwiferyAnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesSwineVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19EthnicityHealth equityMidwivesRacial disparityVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35717164
PMCPMC9206526
OpenAlexW4283124219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.