ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Comparative efficacy of traditional conservative treatment and CT-guided local chemotherapy for mild spinal tuberculosis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis: an updated review.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Clinical effect of posterior-only approach debridement, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation for upper thoracic tuberculosis.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024Article
- IL-10 and TGF-β1 may weaken the efficacy of preoperative anti-tuberculosis therapy in older patients with spinal tuberculosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are considerable differences in the treatment strategy for spinal tuberculosis, including conservative or surgical procedures. Conservative treatment is always suitable for most patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of traditional conservative treatment with CT-guided local chemotherapy strategy of mild spinal tuberculosis.
methodsThis research retrospectively analysed 120 patients with spinal tuberculosis between January 2005 and January 2016 according to the diagnostic criteria of mild spinal tuberculosis. In total, 89 patients underwent traditional conservative treatment, 31 underwent CT-guided local chemotherapy. Clinical outcome, laboratory indexes, and radiological results were analysed to provide a clinical basis for the choice of mild spinal tuberculosis treatment.
resultsAll cases achieved a clinical cure with 24 to 50 months followed up. Cobb angle of the two groups spinal tuberculosis segments was 6.25 ± 3.1100B0, 5.69 ± 2.5800B0 before treatment and 12.36 ± 6.3100B0, 14.87 ± 7.2600B0 after treatment, respectively. The VAS scores were significantly decreased post-treatment. At the 1 month follow-up, the VAS scores and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly differences between the two groups. The efficacy in the CT-guided local chemotherapy (Group B) was better than the traditional conservative treatment (Group A). But from the 3 months follow-up to the last follow-up, the VAS scores and ESR was no significant differences between the two groups and the average ESR decreased to normal. There was no evident kyphosis, symptoms or neurological deficits at the final follow-up. The paravertebral abscesses had disappeared, with no significant progression of local kyphosis, significant absorption and clear lesion edges, pain relief and normal ESR in the two groups.
conclusionsFor mild spinal tuberculosis, traditional conservative treatment can achieve satisfactory results. The strategy combined with CT-guided local chemotherapy treatment is minimally invasive, beneficial for the drainage of paravertebral abscesses and pain relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.