ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2022
Contrastive semi-supervised harmonization of single-shell to multi-shell diffusion MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for fODF Estimation in Infant Brains: Model Comparison, Ground-Truth Impact, and Domain Shift Mitigation.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Article
- Diffusion MRI harmonization via personalized template mapping.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Image harmonization: A review of statistical and deep learning methods for removing batch effects and evaluation metrics for effective harmonization.NeuroImage · 2023Review
- A Unified Learning Model for Estimating Fiber Orientation Distribution Functions on Heterogeneous Multi-shell Diffusion-Weighted MRI.Computational diffusion MRI. CDMRI (Workshop) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) harmonization is necessary for multi-site or multi-acquisition studies. Current statistical methods address the need to harmonize from one site to another, but do not simultaneously consider the use of multiple datasets which are comprised of multiple sites, acquisitions protocols, and age demographics. This work explores deep learning methods which can generalize across these variations through semi-supervised and unsupervised learning while also learning to estimate multi-shell data from single-shell data using the Multi-shell Diffusion MRI Harmonization Challenge (MUSHAC) and Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging (BLSA) datasets. We compare disentanglement harmonization models, which seek to encode anatomy and acquisition in separate latent spaces, and a CycleGAN harmonization model, which uses generative adversarial networks (GAN) to perform style transfer between sites, to the baseline preprocessing and to SHORE interpolation. We find that the disentanglement models achieve superior performance in harmonizing all data while at the same transforming the input data to a single target space across several diffusion metrics (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, mean kurtosis, primary eigenvector).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.