Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716916›Full record

ArticleBone2022

Low bone mass and impaired fracture healing in mouse models of Trisomy21 (Down syndrome).

Kirby M Sherman, Diarra K Williams, Casey A Welsh, Alexis M Cooper, Alyssa Falck, Shannon Huggins, Rihana S Bokhari, Dana Gaddy, Kent D McKelvey, Lindsay A Dawson and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex specific emergence of trisomicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirby M ShermanDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Diarra K WilliamsDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Casey A WelshDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Alexis M CooperDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Alyssa FalckDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Shannon HugginsDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Rihana S BokhariDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Dana GaddyDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Kent D McKelveyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States of America; Department of Medical Genetics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States of America.
Lindsay A DawsonDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America.
Larry J SuvaDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America. Electronic address: larry-suva@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Understanding the skeleton in Down SyndromeR01HD102909 · NICHD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI SUVA, LARRY J. · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Veterinary Student Research TrainingT35OD010991 · OD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI GADDY, DANA · 2012 to 2025
$920k
Modeling Odontohypophosphatasia in the SheepR21DE028076 · NIDCR · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI GADDY, DANA · 2018 to 2019
$422k
Investigating injury response and bone regeneration in Down syndrome mouse modelsF31HD110287 · NICHD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, KIRBY M. · 2022 to 2024
$116k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD110287NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102909NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE028076NIH HHS T35 OD010991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS), the result of trisomy of human chromosome Hsa21 (Ts21), present with an array of skeletal abnormalities typified by altered craniofacial features, short stature and low bone mineral density (BMD). While bone deficits progress with age in both sexes, low bone mass is more pronounced in DS men than women and osteopenia appears earlier. In the current study, the reproductive hormone status (FSH, LH, testosterone) of 17 DS patients (males, ages range 19-52 years) was measured. Although testosterone was consistently low, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis was intact with corresponding rises in FSH and LH. To provide further insight into the heterogeneity of the bone mass in DS, the skeletal phenotypes of three of the most used murine DS models, Ts65Dn (Ts65), TC1, and Dp16(Yey1) (Dp16) were characterized and contrasted. Evaluation of the bone phenotype of both male and female 3-month-old Dp16 mice demonstrated sexual dimorphism, with low bone mass apparent in males, as it is in Ts65, but not in female Dp16. In contrast, male TC1 mice had no apparent bone phenotype. To determine whether low bone mass in DS impacted fracture healing, fractures of the middle phalanx (P2) digits were generated in both male and female Dp16 mice at 15 weeks of age, an age where the sexually dimorphic low BMD persisted. Fracture healing was assessed via in vivo microCT over (13 weeks) 93 days post fracture (DPF). At 93 DPF, 0 % of DS male (n = 12) or female (n = 8) fractures healed, compared to 50 % of the male (n = 28) or female (n = 8) WT littermate fractures. MicroCT revealed periosteal unbridged mineralized callus formation across the fracture gap in Dp16 mice, which was confirmed by subsequent histology. These studies provide the first direct evidence of significantly impaired fracture healing in the setting of DS.

Indexed as

Down SyndromeFractures, BoneAdultAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneFracture HealingHumansInfantMaleMiceMiddle AgedTestosteroneYoung AdultFollicle Stimulating HormoneTestosteroneDown syndromeFracture healingGenetic mouse modelsOsteopeniaSkeletal abnormalities

Identifiers

PMID35716916
PMCPMC9356441
OpenAlexW4282945868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.