Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716762›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2022

Supporting discovery and development of medical countermeasures for chemical injury to eye and skin.

Houmam Araj, Hung Tseng, David T Yeung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Elements of successful NIH grant applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consilience and unity in ocular anterior segment research.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Houmam ArajDepartment of Health and Human Services, National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health (NEI/NIH), 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20817, United States. Electronic address: houmam.araj@nih.gov.
Hung TsengDepartment of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal & Skin Diseases/National Institutes of Health (NIAMS/NIH), 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States. Electronic address: hung.tseng@nih.gov.
David T YeungDepartment of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/National Institutes of Health (NIAID/NIH), 5601 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States. Electronic address: dy70v@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vesicants, from vesica (Latin for blister), can cause local and systemic toxicity. They include the chemotherapy drug nitrogen mustard and chemical warfare agents sulfur mustard, Lewisite, and phosgene oxime. These agents are commonly released in vapor form and consequently, eyes and skin are the most vulnerable. The ocular and cutaneous injuries can be acute, subacute, or chronic, and can predispose casualties to secondary deleterious effects. Underlying these broad organ responses are shared and tissue-specific cellular and molecular biological cascades that attempt to counteract such chemical injuries. Depending on the severity of the chemical insult, biological responses often lead to inadequate wound healing and result in long-term pathology instead. Exposure to other toxic industrial chemicals such as acrolein, chloropicrin, and hydrogen fluoride, can also cause prominent eye and skin damage. There are currently no FDA-approved drugs to counteract these injuries. Hence, the possibility of a mass casualty emergency involving these chemicals is a major public health concern. Recognizing this critical challenge, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is committed to the development of medical countermeasures to advance national health and medical preparedness against these highly toxic chemicals. Here, we provide an overview of various HHS funding and scientific opportunities available in this space, emphasizing parallels between eye and skin response to chemical injury. We also discuss a main limitation of existing data and suggest ways to overcome it.

Indexed as

Burns, ChemicalChemical Warfare AgentsMedical CountermeasuresMustard GasHumansMechlorethamineSkinUnited StatesChemical Warfare AgentsMechlorethamineMustard GasChemical injuryCorneaFundingLewisiteMedical countermeasureNitrogen mustardOcular surfaceSkinSulfur mustardVesicant

Identifiers

PMID35716762
PMCPMC9271609
OpenAlexW4282963689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.