Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716315›Full record

Observational studyThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2023

Impact of a diabetes disease management program on guideline-adherent care, hospitalization risk and health care costs: a propensity score matching study using real-world data.

Marc Höglinger, Brigitte Wirth, Maria Carlander, Cornelia Caviglia, Christian Frei, Birgitta Rhomberg, Adrian Rohrbasser, Maria Trottmann, Klaus Eichler

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The impact of Choosing WiselyBMC health services research · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marc HöglingerHealth Services Research, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Gertrudstrasse 15, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland. marc.hoeglinger@zhaw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2743-2199
Brigitte WirthHealth Services Research, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Gertrudstrasse 15, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-1800
Maria CarlanderHealth Services Research, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Gertrudstrasse 15, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-0133
Cornelia CavigliaMedbase Health Care Provider, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Christian FreiSwica Health Insurance, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Birgitta RhombergSwica Health Insurance, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Adrian RohrbasserMedbase Health Care Provider, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-6821
Maria TrottmannSwica Health Insurance, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3592-0934
Klaus EichlerHealth Services Research, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Gertrudstrasse 15, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CHMedbase · CHUniversity of Bern · CHZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a DMP for patients with diabetes mellitus in a Swiss primary care setting.

methodsIn a prospective observational study, we compared diabetes patients in a DMP (intervention group; N = 538) with diabetes patients receiving usual care (control group; N = 5050) using propensity score matching with entropy balancing. Using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach, we compared changes in outcomes from baseline (2017) to 1-year (2017/18) and to 2-year follow-up (2017/19). Outcomes included four measures for guideline-adherent diabetes care, hospitalization risk, and health care costs.

resultsWe identified a positive impact of the DMP on the share of patients fulfilling all measures for guideline-adherent care [DiD 2017/18: 7.2 percentage-points, p < 0.01; 2017/19: 8.4 percentage-points, p < 0.001]. The hospitalization risk was lower in the intervention group in both years, but only statistically significant in the 1-year follow-up [DiD 2017/18: - 5.7 percentage-points, p < 0.05; 2017/19: - 3.9 percentage points, n.s.]. The increase in health care costs was smaller in the intervention than in the control group [DiD 2017/18: CHF - 852; 2017/19: CHF - 909], but this effect was not statistically significant.

conclusionThe DMP under evaluation seems to exert a positive impact on the quality of diabetes care, reflected in the increase in the measures for guideline-adherent care and in a reduction of the hospitalization risk in the intervention group. It also might reduce health care costs, but only a longer follow-up will show whether the observed effect persists over time.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Delivery of Health CareDisease ManagementHospitalizationHumansPropensity ScoreDiabetesDisease managementPrimary careProgram evaluationQuality of careStructured treatment program

Identifiers

PMID35716315
PMCPMC10060321
OpenAlexW4283067531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.