Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716254›Full record

ArticleClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2023

Systemic Sclerosis-Specific Antibodies: Novel and Classical Biomarkers.

Ilaria Cavazzana, Tamara Vojinovic, Paolo Airo', Micaela Fredi, Angela Ceribelli, Eleonora Pedretti, Maria Grazia Lazzaroni, Emirena Garrafa, Franco Franceschini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genome-scale perturbation signatures from primary human CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ilaria CavazzanaRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy. ilariacava@virgilio.it.
Tamara VojinovicRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Paolo Airo'Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Micaela FrediRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Angela CeribelliDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora PedrettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Maria Grazia LazzaroniRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Emirena GarrafaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Franco FranceschiniRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITHumanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease-specific autoantibodies are considered the most important biomarkers for systemic sclerosis (SSc), due to their ability to stratify patients with different severity and prognosis. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), occurring in subjects with isolated Raynuad's phenomenon, are considered the strongest independent predictors of definite SSc and digital microvascular damage, as observed by nailfold videocapillaroscopy. ANA are present in more than 90% of SSc, but ANA negativity does not exclude SSc diagnosis: a little rate of SSc ANA negative exists and shows a distinct subtype of disease, with less vasculopathy, but more frequent lower gastrointestinal involvement and severe disease course. Anti-centromere, anti-Th/To, and anti-Topoisomerase I antibodies could be considered as classical biomarkers, covering about 60% of SSc and defining patients with well-described cardio-pulmonary complications. In particular, anti-Topoisomerase I represent a risk factor for development of diffuse cutaneous involvement and digital ulcers in the first 3 years of disease, as well as severe interstitial lung disease (ILD). Anti-RNA polymerase III is a biomarker with new clinical implications: very rapid skin thickness progression, gastric antral vascular ectasia, the occurrence of synchronous cancers, and possible association with silicone breast implants rupture. Moreover, novel SSc specific autoantibodies have been globally described in about 10% of "seronegative" SSc patients: anti-elF2B, anti-RuvBL1/2 complex, anti-U11/U12 RNP, and anti-BICD2 depict specific SSc subtypes with severe organ complications. Many autoantibodies could be considered markers of overlap syndromes, including SSc. Anti-Ku are found in 2-7% of SSc, strictly defining the PM/SSc overlap. They are associated with synovitis, joint contractures, myositis, and negatively associated with vascular manifestation of disease. Anti-U3RNP are associated with a well-defined clinical phenotype: Afro-Caribbean male patients, younger at diagnosis, and higher risk of pulmonary hypertension and gastrointestinal involvement. Anti-PM/Scl define SSc patients with high frequency of ILD, calcinosis, dermatomyositis skin changes, and severe myositis. The accurate detection of autoantibodies SSc specific and associated with overlap syndromes is crucial for patients' stratification. ANA should be correctly identified using indirect immunofluorescent assay and a standardized way of patterns' interpretation. The gold-standard technique for autoantibodies' identification in SSc is still considered immunoprecipitation, for its high sensitivity and specificity, but other assays have been widely used in routine practice. The identification of SSc autoantibodies with high diagnostic specificity and high predictive value is mandatory for early diagnosis, a specific follow-up and the possible definition of the best therapy for every SSc subsets. In addition, the validation of novel autoantibodies is mandatory in wider cohorts in order to restrict the gap of so-called seronegative SSc patients.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesLung Diseases, InterstitialMyositisScleroderma, SystemicAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesBiomarkersHumansMaleSkin UlcerAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesBiomarkersAnti-nuclear antibodiesDisease-specific autoantibodiesSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35716254
PMCPMC10167150
OpenAlexW4283070673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.