ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2022
Orthostatic intolerance: a handicap of aging or physical deconditioning?
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Portable, Active Abdominal Compression Binder for Orthostatic Intolerance: Design and Evaluation in Healthy Subjects.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Trial
- Heated environment increases blood pressure drop and postural sway during initial orthostasis in healthy subjects.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Alterations of Body Composition, Blood Morphology and Fibrinogen Concentration after Vibration Therapy in Older Adult Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Importance of the Diaphragm in Neuromotor Function in the Patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite several studies that have been investigated physical inactivity and age-related effects on orthostatic tolerance, impaired hemodynamics and postural balance responses to orthostatic stress are incorrectly attributed to aging or sedentarism alone. The isolated effects from aging and sedentarism should be investigated through comparative studies between senior athletes and age-matched controls, and physical activity assessments on aging follow-up studies. On the other hand, bed rest and space flight studies mimic accelerated physical inactivity or disuse, which is not the same physiological decline provoked by aging alone. Thus, the elementary question is: could orthostatic intolerance be attributed to aging or physical inactivity? The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of possible mechanisms underlying orthostatic tolerance contrasting the paradigm of aging and/or physical inactivity. The key points of this review are the following: (1) to counterpoint all relevant literature on physiological aspects of orthostatic tolerance; (2) to explore the mechanistic aspects underneath the cerebrovascular, cardiorespiratory, and postural determinants of orthostatic tolerance; and (3) examine non-pharmacological interventions with the potential to counterbalance the physical inactivity and aging effects. To date, the orthostatic intolerance cannot be attributed exclusively with aging since physical inactivity plays an important role in postural balance, neurovascular and cardiorespiratory responses to orthostatic stress. These physiological determinates should be interpreted within an integrative approach of orthostatic tolerance, that considers the interdependence between physiological systems in a closed-loop model. Based on this multisystem approach, acute and chronic countermeasures may combat aging and sedentarism effects on orthostatic tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.