Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716139›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2022

Human papillomavirus self-sampling with mRNA testing benefits routine screening.

Eeva Auvinen, Pekka Nieminen, Jukka Pellinen, Joakim Dillner, Jussi Tarkkanen, Anni Virtanen

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cervical cancer screening strategies in women 65 years and older in the human papillomavirus era: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human papillomavirus-based testing and self-sampling approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolving HPV diagnostics: current practice and future frontiers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Validation of an on-chip p16Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eeva AuvinenDepartment of Virology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center and University of Helsinki and HUS, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2094-985X
Pekka NieminenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka PellinenCity of Helsinki, Finland.
Joakim DillnerCenter for Cervical Cancer Prevention, Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Laboratory and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8588-6506
Jussi TarkkanenDepartment of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anni VirtanenDepartment of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIHerttoniemi Hospital · FIKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) based screening provides the possibility of vaginal self-sampling as a tool to increase screening attendance. In order to evaluate the impact and feasibility of opt-in self-sampling in the Finnish setting, we invited a randomized population of 5350 women not attending screening after age group invitation or after reminder, to attend HPV self-sampling-based screening in the autumn of 2018 in Helsinki. Out of those, 1282 (24.0%) expressed their interest and ordered the sampling package. Eventually 787 women (14.7% of the total invited population) took part in screening, 770 women by providing a vaginal sample within 2 months from invitation and 17 by providing a pap smear in the laboratory. Self-taken samples were collected in Aptima Multitest vials and tested using the Aptima HPV mRNA assay. A high proportion, 158/770 (20.5%) of the samples were positive in the Aptima HPV assay. One hundred and forty-one samples were further submitted to Aptima HPV Genotyping and extended genotyping by a Luminex based assay. Of those, 23 samples (16.3%) were HPV 16 positive and 7 (5.0%) were positive for HPV 18/45; extended genotyping revealed multiple high-risk and low-risk HPV genotypes. At follow-up seven cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were diagnosed, which represents 4.4% of HPV positive women and 0.9% of screened women, whereas the rate was 0.5% in routine screening. Our findings suggest that self-sampling with HPV mRNA testing is a feasible approach to improve screening efficacy in a high-risk population among original nonattendees.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaeRNA, MessengerSpecimen HandlingVaginal SmearsRNA, MessengerAptimaHPVmRNAopt-inself-sampling

Identifiers

PMID35716139
PMCPMC9796070
OpenAlexW4283066641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.