Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716125›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

Expansion microscopy allows high resolution single cell analysis of epigenetic readers.

Aline Acke, Siska Van Belle, Boris Louis, Raffaele Vitale, Susana Rocha, Thierry Voet, Zeger Debyser, Johan Hofkens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. From gut to proteomics: the impact ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Toward a comprehensive view of gene architecture during transcription.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Aline AckeLaboratory for Photochemistry and Spectroscopy, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6876-8583
Siska Van BelleLaboratory for Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Boris LouisLaboratory for Photochemistry and Spectroscopy, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Raffaele VitaleDynamics, Nanoscopy and Chemometrics (DYNACHEM) Group, U. Lille, CNRS, LASIRE, Laboratoire Avancé de Spectroscopie pour les Interactions, la Réactivité et l'Environnement, Cité Scientifique, F-59000Lille, France.
Susana RochaLaboratory for Photochemistry and Spectroscopy, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Thierry VoetDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Zeger DebyserLaboratory for Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3982-1565
Johan HofkensLaboratory for Photochemistry and Spectroscopy, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLund University · SEMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between epigenetic readers and histone modifications play a pivotal role in gene expression regulation and aberrations can enact etiopathogenic roles in both developmental and acquired disorders like cancer. Typically, epigenetic interactions are studied by mass spectrometry or chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing. However, in these methods, spatial information is completely lost. Here, we devise an expansion microscopy based method, termed Expansion Microscopy for Epigenetics or ExEpi, to preserve spatial information and improve resolution. We calculated relative co-localization ratios for two epigenetic readers, lens epithelium derived growth factor (LEDGF) and bromodomain containing protein 4 (BRD4), with marks for heterochromatin (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3) and euchromatin (H3K36me2, H3K36me3 and H3K9/14ac). ExEpi confirmed their preferred epigenetic interactions, showing co-localization for LEDGF with H3K36me3/me2 and for BRD4 with H3K9/14ac. Moreover addition of JQ1, a known BET-inhibitor, abolished BRD4 interaction with H3K9/14ac with an IC50 of 137 nM, indicating ExEpi could serve as a platform for epigenetic drug discovery. Since ExEpi retains spatial information, the nuclear localization of marks and readers was determined, which is one of the main advantages of ExEpi. The heterochromatin mark, H3K9me3, is located in the nuclear rim whereas LEDGF co-localization with H3K36me3 and BRD4 co-localization with H3K9/14ac occur further inside the nucleus.

Indexed as

Histone CodeSingle-Cell AnalysisEpigenesis, GeneticEuchromatinHeterochromatinHistonesMicroscopyNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsEuchromatinHeterochromatinHistonesNuclear ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID35716125
PMCPMC9508849
OpenAlexW4283072597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.