ReviewBirth defects research2022
Genotype-phenotype spectrum and correlations in Xia-Gibbs syndrome: Report of five novel cases and literature review.
Review in Birth defects research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correction: Phenotypic subtypes of Xia-Gibbs syndrome: a latent class analysis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Xia-Gibbs Syndrome: Expanding the Phenotypic Spectrum in a Brazilian Cohort.Clinical genetics · 2025Article
- Phenotypic subtypes of Xia-Gibbs syndrome: a latent class analysis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Molecular features of AHDC1: insights into an overlooked gene with broad functional potential.Human genetics · 2025Review
- Xia-Gibbs syndrome in an 18-Year-Old Iranian girl: a case study of clinical features and genetic mutation.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Genotype-phenotype spectrum and correlations in Xia-Gibbs syndrome: Report of five novel cases and literature review.Birth defects research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundXia-Gibbs syndrome (XGS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the AT-hook DNA-binding motif-containing 1 gene (AHDC1), encoding a protein with a crucial role in transcription and epigenetic regulation, axonogenesis, brain function, and neurodevelopment. AHDC1 variants possibly act through a dominant-negative mechanism and may interfere with DNA repair processes, leading to genome instability and impaired DNA translesion repair. Variants affecting residues closer to the N-terminal are thought to determine a milder phenotype with better cognitive performances. However, clean-cut genotype-phenotype correlations are still lacking. CASES: In this study, we investigated five subjects with XGS in whom exome sequencing led to the identification of five novel de novo pathogenic variants in AHDC1. All variants were extremely rare and predicted to cause a loss of protein function. The phenotype of the reported patients included developmental delay, hypotonia, and distinctive facial dysmorphisms. Additionally, uncommon clinical features were observed, including congenital hypothyroidism and peculiar skeletal abnormalities.
conclusionsIn this study, we report uncommon XGS features associated with five novel truncating variants in AHDC, thus expanding the genotype and phenotypic spectrum of this complex condition. We also compared our cases to previously reported cases, discussing the current status of genotype-phenotype correlations in XGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.