Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716078›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Rapid development of a COVID-19 care planning decision-aid for family carers of people living with dementia.

Emily West, Pushpa Nair, Narin Aker, Elizabeth L Sampson, Kirsten Moore, Jill Manthorpe, Greta Rait, Kate Walters, Nuriye Kupeli, Nathan Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Co-design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Co-Design of a Facilitated Self-Management Toolkit for People With Parkinson's Disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Co-Designing a Palliative Dementia Care Framework to Support Holistic Assessment and Decision Making: The EMBED-Care Framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid development of a COVID-19 care planning decision-aid for family carers of people living with dementia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily WestMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3945-060X
Pushpa NairDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7326-7716
Narin AkerDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1618-1072
Elizabeth L SampsonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8929-7362
Kirsten MooreMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-3213
Jill ManthorpeNIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, Strand, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-1410
Greta RaitDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-7294
Kate WaltersDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2173-2430
Nuriye KupeliMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6511-412X
Nathan DaviesMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7757-5353

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UMarie Curie MCRGS-20171219-8004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 has disproportionately affected people living with dementia and their carers. Its effects on health and social care systems necessitated a rapid-response approach to care planning and decision-making in this population, with reflexivity and responsiveness to changing individual and system needs at its core. Considering this, a decision-aid to help families of persons with dementia was developed.

objectivesTo coproduce with people living with dementia, and the people who care for them, a decision-aid for family carers of people living with dementia, to support decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were undertaken in 2020 with: (1) staff from two English national end-of-life and supportive care organizations; and (2) people living with dementia and family carers. Simultaneously, a rapid review of current evidence on making decisions with older people at the end of life was undertaken. Evidence from these inputs was combined to shape the decision-aid through a series of workshops with key stakeholders, including our patient and public involvement group, which consisted of a person living with dementia and family carers; a group of clinical and academic experts and a group of policy and charity leads.

resultsThe rapid review of existing evidence highlighted the need to consider both process and outcome elements of decision-making and their effects on people living with dementia and their families. The qualitative interviews discussed a wide range of topics, including trust, agency and confusion in making decisions in the context of COVID-19. The decision-aid primarily focussed on care moves, legal matters, carer wellbeing and help-seeking.

conclusionsCombining different sources and forms of evidence was a robust and systematic process that proved efficient and valuable in creating a novel decision-aid for family carers within the context of COVID-19. The output from this process is an evidence-based practical decision-aid coproduced with people living with dementia, family carers, clinical and academic experts and leading national dementia and palliative care organizations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We worked with people living with dementia and family carers and other key stakeholders throughout this study, from study development and design to inclusion in stakeholder workshops and dissemination.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaAgedCaregiversDecision MakingHumansPandemicscoproductionCOVID-19decision makingdementiaengagement

Identifiers

PMID35716078
PMCPMC9327830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.