Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35716049›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2022

Pregnancy after living kidney donation, a systematic review of the available evidence, and a review of the current guidance.

Maria Pippias, Laura Skinner, Marlies Noordzij, Anna Varberg Reisaeter, Daniel Abramowicz, Vianda S Stel, Kitty J Jager

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pregnancy after living kidney donation, a systematic review of the available evidence, and a review of the current guidance.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Donor medicine: An emerging field in nephrology.World journal of nephrology · 2026
    Review
  3. Evaluation and Counseling of Living Kidney Donor Candidates.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evaluating Risk in Kidney Living Donors.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-Term Kidney and Maternal Outcomes After Pregnancy in Living Kidney Donors.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria PippiasBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7469-4955
Laura SkinnerNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Renal Unit, Bristol, UK.
Marlies NoordzijDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anna Varberg ReisaeterDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway.
Daniel AbramowiczDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Vianda S StelERA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kitty J JagerERA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and communicating the risk of pregnancy complications post-living kidney donation is imperative as the majority of living kidney donors (LKD) are women of childbearing age. We aimed to identify all original research articles examining complications in post-donation pregnancies and compared the quality and consistency of related guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, society webpages, and guideline registries for English-language publications published up until December 18, 2020. Ninety-three articles were screened from which 16 studies were identified, with a total of 1399 post-donation pregnancies. The outcome of interest, post-donation pregnancy complications, was not calculable, and only a narrative synthesis of the evidence was possible. The absolute risk of pre-eclampsia increased from ~1%-3% pre-donation (lower than the general population) to ~4%-10% post-donation (comparable to the general population). The risks of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes were no different between post-donation and pre-donation pregnancies. Guidelines and consensus statements were consistent in stating the need to inform LKDs of their post-donation pregnancy risk, however, the depth and scope of this guidance were variable. While the absolute risk of pregnancy complications remains low post-donation, a concerted effort is required to better identify and individualize risk in these women, such that consent to donation is truly informed.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornKidneyLiving DonorsMaleNephrectomyPregnancyTissue and Organ Harvestingdonor nephrectomydonor outcomeskidney transplantationliving donorpre-eclampsia

Identifiers

PMID35716049
PMCPMC9804926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.