Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715964›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of dermatology2022

Evaluation of standard treatments for managing adult Japanese patients with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Two-year data from the ADDRESS-J disease registry.

Norito Katoh, Hidehisa Saeki, Yoko Kataoka, Takafumi Etoh, Satoshi Teramukai, Hiroki Takagi, Hiroyuki Fujita, Marius Ardeleanu, Elena Rizova, Kazuhiko Arima and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Defining "Flares" in Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Norito KatohDepartment of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-2482
Hidehisa SaekiDepartment of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-0355
Yoko KataokaDepartment of Dermatology, Osaka Habikino Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5121-0134
Takafumi EtohAtago Dermatology Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi TeramukaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki TakagiSanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki FujitaSanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Marius ArdeleanuRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Elena RizovaSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Kazuhiko ArimaSanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-8787
ADDRESS-J Investigators
Sanofi (Japan) · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNippon Medical School · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPRegeneron (United States) · USSanofi (United States) · USTokyo Teishin Hospital · JP

Funding

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease with a high disease burden, is one of the most common dermatological conditions in Japan. Herein, we report the disease profiles and current AD treatment during 2-year management of Japanese adults with moderate-to-severe AD. ADDRESS-J was a prospective, longitudinal, observational study that evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of current AD treatments of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD (Investigator's Global Assessment score 3 or 4) in Japan. The maximum follow-up period was 2 years. Among 300 patients enrolled, 288 had ≥1 post-baseline evaluation and were analyzed (mean age, 35.5 years; 60.1% male). Almost all patients (99.7%) received topical therapy; the most commonly used therapy was topical corticosteroids of the second-highest potency (86.5%) (e.g., 0.1% mometasone furoate) followed by medium-potency topical corticosteroids (50.3%) (e.g., 0.05% clobetasol butyrate). At month 12 of the study, 10.4% of patients had Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1, similarly at month 24 (10.8%). A total of 132 patients (45.8%) had ≥1 AD flare-up during the observation period, with the majority of first flares occurring within the first year of the study. Various physician- and patient-reported outcomes improved considerably during the first 3 months of the study, with only minor changes after this time. In this cohort, 16.7% of patients had skin infections requiring treatment; 7.3% had adverse events (AE) potentially related to treatment; 1.7% had serious AE; and 1.0% had treatment discontinuations due to AE. Limitations include missing data at later timepoints and the inclusion criteria limiting generalizability. In summary, this analysis of the ADDRESS-J study showed that some patients with moderate or severe AD respond to conventional therapies, while others do not. For those with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD, the newly emerged systemic agents, such as biologics, may provide a potential strategy for long-term disease management.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansJapanMaleProspective StudiesRegistriesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeGlucocorticoidsadultsatopic dermatitisflareslong-term treatmentreal-world study

Identifiers

PMID35715964
PMCPMC9543354
OpenAlexW4283080855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.