Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022
Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02914132 (Safety and Performance Evaluation of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter for Reducing Bacteremia in Patients on Hemodialysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Performance Evaluation of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter for Reducing Bacteremia in Patients on Hemodialysis
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sea nettle jellyfish venom targets proteoglycans to cause cell death and pain.Science advances · 2026Article
- Timing of hemoadsorption in sepsis: redefining early through mediator-guided therapy.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- The Use of Extracorporeal Organ Support Therapies for Acute Kidney Injury in Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Novel extracorporeal therapies in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- The "cytokine storm" in infection and sepsis: win the battle but lose the war.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Knowledge gaps in extracorporeal blood purification: what would be required for its successful application in septic shock?Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- A peptide-based medical device for the selective removal of inflammatory factors from the blood of people with sepsis.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Red Blood Cell-Induced Bacterial Margination Improves Microbial Hemoadsorption on Engineered Cell-Depleted Thrombi, Restoring Severe Bacteremia in Rats.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption in Sepsis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- [Extracorporeal removal of pathogens using a biomimetic adsorber-A new treatment strategy for the intensive care unit : Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter and its fields of application].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- Selective removal of proteins and microvesicles ex vivo from blood of pancreatic cancer patients using bioengineered adsorption filters.Cancer letters · 2025Article
- Haemoadsorption to remove inflammatory mediators in sepsis: past, present, and future.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Article
- Seraph® filter effectiveness in the treatment of circuit-related infections in ECMO patients-a single-center report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Macrophage activation syndrome in Sepsis: from pathogenesis to clinical management.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024Review
- The Seraph 100Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In Vitro Simulated Hemoperfusion on SeraphBiomedicines · 2024Article
- Use of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter in an adolescent patient with disseminated adenoviral disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- [Hemoperfusion in anesthesia and intensive care medicine: benefits, risks, and evidence for different systems].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Review
- The Techniques of Blood Purification in the Treatment of Sepsis and Other Hyperinflammatory Conditions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph® 100), which consists of heparin that is covalently bound to polymer beads, have demonstrated an effective binding of bacteria and viruses. Pathogens adhere to the heparin coated polymer beads in the adsorber as they would normally do to heparan sulfate on cell surfaces. Using this biomimetic principle, the Seraph® 100 could help to decrease bacterial burden in vivo.
methodsThis first in human, prospective, multicenter, non-randomized interventional study included patients with blood culture positive bloodstream infection and the need for kidney replacement therapy as an adjunctive treatment for bloodstream infections. We performed a single four-hour hemoperfusion treatment with the Seraph® 100 in conjunction with a dialysis procedure. Post procedure follow up was 14 days.
resultsFifteen hemodialysis patients (3F/12 M, age 74.0 [68.0-78.5] years, dialysis vintage 28.0 [11.0-45.0] months) were enrolled. Seraph® 100 treatment started 66.4 [45.7-80.6] hours after the initial positive blood culture was drawn. During the treatment with the Seraph® 100 with a median blood flow of 285 [225-300] ml/min no device or treatment related adverse events were reported. Blood pressure and heart rate remained stable while peripheral oxygen saturation improved during the treatment from 98.0 [92.5-98.0] to 99.0 [98.0-99.5] %; p = 0.0184. Four patients still had positive blood culture at the start of Seraph® 100 treatment. In one patient blood cultures turned negative during treatment. The time to positivity (TTP) was increased between inflow and outflow blood cultures by 36 [- 7.2 to 96.3] minutes. However, overall TTP increase was not statistical significant.
conclusionsSeraph® 100 treatment was well tolerated. Adding Seraph® 100 to antibiotics early in the course of bacteremia might result in a faster resolution of bloodstream infections, which has to be evaluated in further studies. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02914132 , first posted September 26, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.