Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715801›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022

Safety and efficacy of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter to remove bacteria from the blood stream: results of the first in human study.

Gabriele Eden, Julius J Schmidt, Stefan Büttner, Philipp Kümpers, Carsten Hafer, Alexandros Rovas, Benjamin Florian Koch, Bernhard M W Schmidt, Jan T Kielstein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02914132 (Safety and Performance Evaluation of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter for Reducing Bacteremia in Patients on Hemodialysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02914132 nacompletednot on this map

Safety and Performance Evaluation of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter for Reducing Bacteremia in Patients on Hemodialysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorExThera Medical CorporationRan2016 to 2018Enrolled15ConditionsBacteremia, Bacterial InfectionArmsSeraph 100 Filter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Novel extracorporeal therapies in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Macrophage activation syndrome in Sepsis: from pathogenesis to clinical management.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Review
  16. The Seraph 100Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriele Eden *Medical Clinic V Nephrology, Rheumatology, Blood Purification, Academic Teaching Hospital, Braunschweig, Germany.
Julius J SchmidtDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. schmidt.julius@mh-hannover.de.
Stefan BüttnerMedizinische Klinik I - Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany.
Philipp KümpersDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Carsten HaferMedical Clinic V Nephrology, Rheumatology, Blood Purification, Academic Teaching Hospital, Braunschweig, Germany.
Alexandros RovasDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin Florian KochMedical Clinic III, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Bernhard M W SchmidtDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Jan T KielsteinMedical Clinic V Nephrology, Rheumatology, Blood Purification, Academic Teaching Hospital, Braunschweig, Germany.
Klinikum Braunschweig · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEKlinikum Aschaffenburg · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph® 100), which consists of heparin that is covalently bound to polymer beads, have demonstrated an effective binding of bacteria and viruses. Pathogens adhere to the heparin coated polymer beads in the adsorber as they would normally do to heparan sulfate on cell surfaces. Using this biomimetic principle, the Seraph® 100 could help to decrease bacterial burden in vivo.

methodsThis first in human, prospective, multicenter, non-randomized interventional study included patients with blood culture positive bloodstream infection and the need for kidney replacement therapy as an adjunctive treatment for bloodstream infections. We performed a single four-hour hemoperfusion treatment with the Seraph® 100 in conjunction with a dialysis procedure. Post procedure follow up was 14 days.

resultsFifteen hemodialysis patients (3F/12 M, age 74.0 [68.0-78.5] years, dialysis vintage 28.0 [11.0-45.0] months) were enrolled. Seraph® 100 treatment started 66.4 [45.7-80.6] hours after the initial positive blood culture was drawn. During the treatment with the Seraph® 100 with a median blood flow of 285 [225-300] ml/min no device or treatment related adverse events were reported. Blood pressure and heart rate remained stable while peripheral oxygen saturation improved during the treatment from 98.0 [92.5-98.0] to 99.0 [98.0-99.5] %; p = 0.0184. Four patients still had positive blood culture at the start of Seraph® 100 treatment. In one patient blood cultures turned negative during treatment. The time to positivity (TTP) was increased between inflow and outflow blood cultures by 36 [- 7.2 to 96.3] minutes. However, overall TTP increase was not statistical significant.

conclusionsSeraph® 100 treatment was well tolerated. Adding Seraph® 100 to antibiotics early in the course of bacteremia might result in a faster resolution of bloodstream infections, which has to be evaluated in further studies. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02914132 , first posted September 26, 2016.

Indexed as

BacteremiaRenal DialysisAgedBacteriaHeparinHumansPolymersProspective StudiesHeparinPolymersBacteraemiaBloodstream infectionsExtracorporeal devicesHaemodialysis

Identifiers

PMID35715801
PMCPMC9205040
OpenAlexW4283014319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.