Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715779›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions.

Jules Canfield, Ve Truong, Agata Bereznicka, Karsten Lunze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jules CanfieldClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 2045, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. jules.canfield@bmc.org.
Ve TruongClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 2045, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Agata BereznickaClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 2045, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Karsten LunzeClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 2045, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBoston Medical Center · USBoston University · US

Funding

Clinical Addiction Research and Education ProgramR25DA013582 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI JEFFREY H. SAMET, Alexander Yale Walley · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases P30AI042853NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA013582NIDA NIH HHS R25DA13582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs students' direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was to provide an overview of clinical modalities and familiarize learners with clinician and patient experiential perspectives.

methodsWe implemented a multi-pronged approach, offering an overview of clinical care programs through remote panels involving care providers at the clinics where students had previously been scheduled for in-person rotations. This included inpatient and office-based addiction services, addiction treatment program for adolescents and young adults, integrated addiction care and HIV primary care clinic, and opioid use urgent care clinic. Beyond having them join outpatient telehealth clinic visits, students also participated in an online panel involving patients in recovery to gain familiarity with their care perspectives; and joined a panel with recovery coaches to get further insights into patient challenges in clinical settings. Students further participated in remote opioid treatment trainings and observed clinical rounds of inpatient addiction consults and adolescent clinic team meetings.

resultsWith this revised curriculum, students learned about the variety of clinical modalities at the height of our hospital's COVID-19 pandemic burden. The evaluation suggested that students appreciated the authenticity of accounts from patients and providers about their challenges and satisfaction related to clinical care. While in a remote learning setting, students overall wished for more personal interaction with patients and providers. They also noted a lack of group cohesion and connection that they felt would otherwise have been met in an in-person program.

conclusionsRemote learning allowed our program to connect trainees to the multidisciplinary field of addiction medicine despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future program iterations, we will consider hybrid formats of in-person learning experiences with direct patient and faculty contact where possible, combined with online provider and patient panels possibly, in addition to virtual breakout formats to facilitate more personal student-patient and student-faculty interactions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdolescentAnalgesics, OpioidCurriculumHumansProblem-Based LearningSuspensionsYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidSuspensionsAddiction medicineCOVID-19Medical educationRemote learning

Identifiers

PMID35715779
PMCPMC9205138
OpenAlexW4283013584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.