Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715748›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Benchmarking imputation methods for network inference using a novel method of synthetic scRNA-seq data generation.

Ayoub Lasri, Vahid Shahrezaei, Marc Sturrock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayoub LasriDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Vahid ShahrezaeiDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Marc SturrockDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. marcsturrock@rcsi.ie.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEImperial College London · GB

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 766069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has very rapidly become the new workhorse of modern biology providing an unprecedented global view on cellular diversity and heterogeneity. In particular, the structure of gene-gene expression correlation contains information on the underlying gene regulatory networks. However, interpretation of scRNA-seq data is challenging due to specific experimental error and biases that are unique to this kind of data including drop-out (or technical zeros).

methodsTo deal with this problem several methods for imputation of zeros for scRNA-seq have been developed. However, it is not clear how these processing steps affect inference of genetic networks from single cell data. Here, we introduce Biomodelling.jl, a tool for generation of synthetic scRNA-seq data using multiscale modelling of stochastic gene regulatory networks in growing and dividing cells.

resultsOur tool produces realistic transcription data with a known ground truth network topology that can be used to benchmark different approaches for gene regulatory network inference. Using this tool we investigate the impact of different imputation methods on the performance of several network inference algorithms.

conclusionsBiomodelling.jl provides a versatile and useful tool for future development and benchmarking of network inference approaches using scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareBenchmarkingGene regulatory networksImputationNetwork inferencescRNA-seqStochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID35715748
PMCPMC9204969
OpenAlexW4283009707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.