Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715741›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2022

Hypermethylation of TMEM240 predicts poor hormone therapy response and disease progression in breast cancer.

Ruo-Kai Lin, Chih-Ming Su, Shih-Yun Lin, Le Thi Anh Thu, Phui-Ly Liew, Jian-Yu Chen, Huey-En Tzeng, Yun-Ru Liu, Tzu-Hao Chang, Cheng-Yang Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruo-Kai Lin *Program in Drug Discovery and Development Industry, Program in Clinical Drug Development of Herbal Medicine, Master Program in Clinical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Pharmacy, Graduate Institute of Pharmacognosy, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Ming Su *Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Shih-Yun LinProgram in Drug Discovery and Development Industry, Program in Clinical Drug Development of Herbal Medicine, Master Program in Clinical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Pharmacy, Graduate Institute of Pharmacognosy, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Le Thi Anh ThuQuang Tri Medical College, Dien Bien Phu Str., Dong Luong District, Dong Ha City, Quang Tri, Vietnam.
Phui-Ly LiewDepartment of Pathology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Jian-Yu ChenSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huey-En TzengDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yun-Ru LiuJoint Biobank, Office of Human Research, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hao ChangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yang LeeBioinformatics Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chin-Sheng HungDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. hungcs@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-9515-2036
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 25% of patients with early-stage breast cancer experience cancer progression throughout the disease course. Alterations in TMEM240 in breast cancer were identified and investigated to monitor treatment response and disease progression.

methodsCirculating methylated TMEM240 in the plasma of breast cancer patients was used to monitor treatment response and disease progression. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data in Western countries and Illumina methylation arrays in Taiwanese breast cancer patients were used to identify novel hypermethylated CpG sites and genes related to poor hormone therapy response. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP), real-time reverse transcription PCR, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed to measure DNA methylation and mRNA and protein expression levels in 394 samples from Taiwanese and Korean breast cancer patients. TMEM240 gene manipulation, viability, migration assays, RNA-seq, and MetaCore were performed to determine its biological functions and relationship to hormone drug treatment response in breast cancer cells.

resultsAberrant methylated TMEM240 was identified in breast cancer patients with poor hormone therapy response using genome-wide methylation analysis in the Taiwan and TCGA breast cancer cohorts. A cell model showed that TMEM240, which is localized to the cell membrane and cytoplasm, represses breast cancer cell proliferation and migration and regulates the expression levels of enzymes involved in estrone and estradiol metabolism. TMEM240 protein expression was observed in normal breast tissues but was not detected in 88.2% (67/76) of breast tumors and in 90.0% (9/10) of metastatic tumors from breast cancer patients. QMSP revealed that in 54.5% (55/101) of Taiwanese breast cancer patients, the methylation level of TMEM240 was at least twofold higher in tumor tissues than in matched normal breast tissues. Patients with hypermethylation of TMEM240 had poor 10-year overall survival (p = 0.003) and poor treatment response, especially hormone therapy response (p < 0.001). Circulating methylated TMEM240 dramatically and gradually decreased and then diminished in patients without disease progression, whereas it returned and its levels in plasma rose again in patients with disease progression. Prediction of disease progression based on circulating methylated TMEM240 was found to have 87.5% sensitivity, 93.1% specificity, and 90.2% accuracy.

conclusionsHypermethylation of TMEM240 is a potential biomarker for treatment response and disease progression monitoring in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationMembrane ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorCpG IslandsDisease ProgressionFemaleHormonesHumansPredictive Value of TestsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorHormonesMembrane ProteinsTMEM240 protein, humanBreast cancerCell motilityCirculating cell-free DNADisease progressionDNA methylationMetaCore and hormone therapyProliferationRNA-seqTMEM240Tumor suppressor genes

Identifiers

PMID35715741
PMCPMC9204905
OpenAlexW4283009905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.