Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715740›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Evidence-based Shared-Decision-Making Assistant (SDM-assistant) for choosing antipsychotics: protocol of a cluster-randomized trial in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.

Spyridon Siafis, Nicola Bursch, Katharina Müller, Lisa Schmid, Florian Schuster, Jakob Waibel, Tri Huynh, Florian Matthes, Alessandro Rodolico, Peter Brieger and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Schizophrenia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Spyridon SiafisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. spyridon.siafis@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-2039
Nicola BurschDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katharina Müllerkbo-Isar-Amper-Klinik, Munich, Germany.
Lisa SchmidDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian SchusterSchön Klinik Roseneck, Rosenheim, Germany.
Jakob WaibelDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tri HuynhDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian MatthesDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alessandro RodolicoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Peter Briegerkbo-Isar-Amper-Klinik, Munich, Germany.
Markus BühnerPsychological Methodology and Diagnostics, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Stephan Hereskbo-Isar-Amper-Klinik, Munich, Germany.
Stefan Leucht *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes Hamann *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEIsar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESchön Klinik Roseneck · DEUniversity of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChoosing an antipsychotic medication is an important medical decision in the treatment of schizophrenia. This decision requires risk-benefit assessments of antipsychotics, and thus, shared-decision making between physician and patients is strongly encouraged. Although the efficacy and side-effect profiles of antipsychotics are well-established, there is no clear framework for the communication of the evidence between physicians and patients. For this reason, we developed an evidence-based shared-decision making assistant (SDM-assistant) that presents high-quality evidence from network meta-analysis on the efficacy and side-effect profile of antipsychotics and can be used as a basis for shared-decision making between physicians and patients when selecting antipsychotic medications.

methodsThe planned matched-pair cluster-randomised trial will be conducted in acute psychiatric wards (n = 14 wards planned) and will include adult inpatients with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like disorders (N = 252 participants planned). On the intervention wards, patients and their treating physicians will use the SDM-assistant, whenever a decision on choosing an antipsychotic is warranted. On the control wards, antipsychotics will be chosen according to treatment-as-usual. The primary outcome will be patients' perceived involvement in the decision-making during the inpatient stay as measured with the SDM-Q-9. We will also assess therapeutic alliance, symptom severity, side-effects, treatment satisfaction, adherence, quality of life, functioning and rehospitalizations as secondary outcomes. Outcomes could be analysed at discharge and at follow-up after three months from discharge. The analysis will be conducted per-protocol using mixed-effects linear regression models for continuous outcomes and logistic regression models using generalised estimating equations for dichotomous outcomes. Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of the intervention will also be examined using a qualitative content analysis. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial to examine a decision assistant specifically designed to facilitate shared-decision making for choosing antipsychotic medications, i.e., SDM-assistant, in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. If the intervention can be successfully implemented, SDM-assistant could advance evidence-based medicine in schizophrenia by putting medical evidence on antipsychotics into the context of patient preferences and values. This could subsequently lead to a higher involvement of the patients in decision-making and better therapy decisions.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00027316 , registration date 26.01.2022).

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaAdultAminoacridinesDecision MakingHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAminoacridinesAntipsychotic AgentsSDMAntipsychoticDecision aidEBMHealth service researchInpatient psychiatryPatient preferencePsychosisResponseSDMSide-effect

Identifiers

PMID35715740
PMCPMC9204887
OpenAlexW4283033871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.