ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
Explainable deep drug-target representations for binding affinity prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DTBA-net: Drug-Target Binding Affinity prediction using feature selection in hybrid CNN model.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: A Bibliometric Study and Future Research Agenda.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral computational advances have been achieved in the drug discovery field, promoting the identification of novel drug-target interactions and new leads. However, most of these methodologies have been overlooking the importance of providing explanations to the decision-making process of deep learning architectures. In this research study, we explore the reliability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) at identifying relevant regions for binding, specifically binding sites and motifs, and the significance of the deep representations extracted by providing explanations to the model's decisions based on the identification of the input regions that contributed the most to the prediction. We make use of an end-to-end deep learning architecture to predict binding affinity, where CNNs are exploited in their capacity to automatically identify and extract discriminating deep representations from 1D sequential and structural data.
resultsThe results demonstrate the effectiveness of the deep representations extracted from CNNs in the prediction of drug-target interactions. CNNs were found to identify and extract features from regions relevant for the interaction, where the weight associated with these spots was in the range of those with the highest positive influence given by the CNNs in the prediction. The end-to-end deep learning model achieved the highest performance both in the prediction of the binding affinity and on the ability to correctly distinguish the interaction strength rank order when compared to baseline approaches.
conclusionsThis research study validates the potential applicability of an end-to-end deep learning architecture in the context of drug discovery beyond the confined space of proteins and ligands with determined 3D structure. Furthermore, it shows the reliability of the deep representations extracted from the CNNs by providing explainability to the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.