Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715655›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

Ensemble Approaches to Recognize Protected Health Information in Radiology Reports.

Hannah Horng, Jackson Steinkamp, Charles E Kahn, Tessa S Cook

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah HorngDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jackson SteinkampDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Charles E KahnDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ckahn@upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-7434
Tessa S Cook *Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training Program in Biomedical Imaging and Information SciencesT32EB009384 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEE, JAMES C, IVES, ZACHARY · 2009 to 2023
$4.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) techniques for electronic health records have shown great potential to improve the quality of medical care. The text of radiology reports frequently constitutes a large fraction of EHR data, and can provide valuable information about patients' diagnoses, medical history, and imaging findings. The lack of a major public repository for radiological reports severely limits the development, testing, and application of new NLP tools. De-identification of protected health information (PHI) presents a major challenge to building such repositories, as many automated tools for de-identification were trained or designed for clinical notes and do not perform sufficiently well to build a public database of radiology reports. We developed and evaluated six ensemble models based on three publically available de-identification tools: MIT de-id, NeuroNER, and Philter. A set of 1023 reports was set aside as the testing partition. Two individuals with medical training annotated the test set for PHI; differences were resolved by consensus. Ensemble methods included simple voting schemes (1-Vote, 2-Votes, and 3-Votes), a decision tree, a naïve Bayesian classifier, and Adaboost boosting. The 1-Vote ensemble achieved recall of 998 / 1043 (95.7%); the 3-Votes ensemble had precision of 1035 / 1043 (99.2%). F1 scores were: 93.4% for the decision tree, 71.2% for the naïve Bayesian classifier, and 87.5% for the boosting method. Basic voting algorithms and machine learning classifiers incorporating the predictions of multiple tools can outperform each tool acting alone in de-identifying radiology reports. Ensemble methods hold substantial potential to improve automated de-identification tools for radiology reports to make such reports more available for research use to improve patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingRadiologyBayes TheoremElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningDe-identificationEnsemble modelsMachine learningNatural language processingProtected health information (PHI)Reporting

Identifiers

PMID35715655
PMCPMC9712864
OpenAlexW4283016418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.