ReviewBehavior research methods2023
Evaluating Eye Movement Event Detection: A Review of the State of the Art.
Review in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Fixation control and three-point field goal percentage in female collegiate basketball players: an eye-tracking study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Systematic classification differences across eye movement detection algorithms.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- ICTD: Combination of Improved CNN-Transformer and Enhanced Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis for Eye-Movement Emotion Classification.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Eye Movement Classification Using Neuromorphic Vision Sensors.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Introducing the kollaR package: A user-friendly open-access solution for eye-tracking analysis and visualization.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The effect of pupil size on data quality in head-mounted eye trackers.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Assessing Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements Using Eye-Tracking Technology in Patients with Schizophrenia Under Treatment: A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The fundamentals of eye tracking part 2: From research question to operationalization.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Vision toolkit part 2. features and metrics for assessing oculomotor signal: a review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Characterizing eye gaze and mental workload for assistive device control.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
- Applying mobile eye tracking to measure real-time engagement and enhance informal learning at environmental exhibits.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Strategies for enhancing automatic fixation detection in head-mounted eye tracking.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- ACE-DNV: Automatic classification of gaze events in dynamic natural viewing.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Review
- What can entropy metrics tell us about the characteristics of ocular fixation trajectories?PloS one · 2024Article
- Computational approaches to apply the String Edit Algorithm to create accurate visual scan paths.Journal of eye movement research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting eye movements in raw eye tracking data is a well-established research area by itself, as well as a common pre-processing step before any subsequent analysis. As in any field, however, progress and successful collaboration can only be achieved provided a shared understanding of the pursued goal. This is often formalised via defining metrics that express the quality of an approach to solving the posed problem. Both the big-picture intuition behind the evaluation strategies and seemingly small implementation details influence the resulting measures, making even studies with outwardly similar procedures essentially incomparable, impeding a common understanding. In this review, we systematically describe and analyse evaluation methods and measures employed in the eye movement event detection field to date. While recently developed evaluation strategies tend to quantify the detector's mistakes at the level of whole eye movement events rather than individual gaze samples, they typically do not separate establishing correspondences between true and predicted events from the quantification of the discovered errors. In our analysis we separate these two steps where possible, enabling their almost arbitrary combinations in an evaluation pipeline. We also present the first large-scale empirical analysis of event matching strategies in the literature, examining these various combinations both in practice and theoretically. We examine the particular benefits and downsides of the evaluation methods, providing recommendations towards more intuitive and informative assessment. We implemented the evaluation strategies on which this work focuses in a single publicly available library: https://github.com/r-zemblys/EM-event-detection-evaluation .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.