ArticleScientific reports2022
Effectiveness of a multi-loop traction device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainees: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of different traction numbers in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Cholangioscope combined with biliary forceps: a novel double-endoscope traction method for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Usefulness of the anchor traction method for multi-point traction in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective, single-centre study (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Cholangioscope combined with biliary forceps: a novel double-endoscope traction method for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Synergistic advantages of combining a traction device with underwater conditions for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Usefulness of the Bridge Formation Method for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Comparison of traction vs. snare as rescue methods for challenging colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity score-matched study.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of multi-loop traction device-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Multicenter randomized clinical trial.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Bilateral traction method using a clip with thread for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for a rectal tumor behind a rectal fold with novel two-step utilization of a traction device.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Development of a novel multipoint traction device for gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluation of its efficacy and safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Characteristics of positive horizontal margins in patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.DEN open · 2024Article
- Successful closure of gastric wall defect after endoscopic full-thickness resection using novel anchor pronged clips: a case report.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- The efficacy and safety of multi-loop traction device for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single center prospective pilot study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a difficult procedure, and its introduction to trainees has been debated. Although the criteria for performing colorectal ESD vary among institutions, it is often allowed after gaining experience performing surgeries in animals and upper gastrointestinal ESD. This pilot study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of ESD performed by trainees using the multi-loop traction device (MLTD group) and those of conventional ESD performed by experts (control group). It also aimed to determine whether the MLTD can be used to safely introduce colorectal ESD to trainees. We included 26 colorectal ESD patients (13 in the MLTD group and 13 in the control group) treated at our hospital from October to December 2021. There were no significant differences in the procedure time (50 min vs. 30 min), dissection speed (19.9 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.