ReviewNature medicine2022
Redefining critical illness.
Review in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 222 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Observational Study of Biology of Critical Illness
Prospective Observational Study Investigating Genomic Determinants of Outcome From Cardiogenic Shock (GOlDilOCS)
Angiotensin II Stress Test. Renin Kinetics During Treatment of Vasoplegic Shock With Angiotensin II in Relation to Hemodynamic Response to Treatment With Angiotensin II.
Precision Medicine Adaptive Network Platform Trial in Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure
Who cites it
222 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 334 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and representation of comorbidities and multimorbidity in randomised controlled trials in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- A consensus immune dysregulation framework for sepsis and critical illnesses.Nature medicine · 2025Guideline
- Genetic association studies in critically ill patients: a systematic review.EBioMedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Preclinical Models of Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Early differential protein expression in blood and bronchoalveolar fluid among ARDS phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Molecular Phenotyping of Sepsis and Differential Response to Fluid Resuscitation.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- Effect of early administration of tetracosactide on mortality and host response in critically ill patients requiring rescue surgery: a sensitivity analysis of the STOPSHOCK phase 3 randomized controlled trial.Military Medical Research · 2024Trial
- Transitions of blood immune endotypes and improved outcome by anakinra in COVID-19 pneumonia: an analysis of the SAVE-MORE randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Novel subtypes of severe COVID-19 respiratory failure based on biological heterogeneity: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Trial
- A pilot study of alternative substrates in the critically Ill subject using a ketogenic feed.Nature communications · 2023Trial
- Body mass index and hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: A retrospective cohort study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- [Personalized sepsis therapy and modern trial designs].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Evaluating plasma ferritin and suPAR as treatable traits for critically ill patients with COVID-19 treated with anakinra: an exploratory analysis of the immune modulation domain of the REMAP-CAP randomised clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Physiological Phenotypes in Comatose ICU Patients: A Retrospective Multidimensional Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Corticosteroids in ARDS: old controversies, new insights, and future directions.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Identifying clinical subtypes in acute dyspnoea patients admitted to the emergency department: a secondary model-based clustering of prospective cohorts.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: from static severity to trajectory-based phenotyping.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Methodological assessment of PDMS passive sampling for skin VOC collection across body sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Aberrant STAT signaling and T cell dysregulation define a targetable pediatric sepsis endotype.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Diagnostic capability of large language models in critically ill patients: a prospective single-centre study comparing ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini with emergency physicians.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research and practice in critical care medicine have long been defined by syndromes, which, despite being clinically recognizable entities, are, in fact, loose amalgams of heterogeneous states that may respond differently to therapy. Mounting translational evidence-supported by research on respiratory failure due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-suggests that the current syndrome-based framework of critical illness should be reconsidered. Here we discuss recent findings from basic science and clinical research in critical care and explore how these might inform a new conceptual model of critical illness. De-emphasizing syndromes, we focus on the underlying biological changes that underpin critical illness states and that may be amenable to treatment. We hypothesize that such an approach will accelerate critical care research, leading to a richer understanding of the pathobiology of critical illness and of the key determinants of patient outcomes. This, in turn, will support the design of more effective clinical trials and inform a more precise and more effective practice at the bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.