ArticleScientific reports2022
Analysis of MRI and CT-based radiomics features for personalized treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer and external validation of published radiomics models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do MRI radiomic models truly generalize? External validation of three studies in parotid lesion characterization.European radiology · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of restaging MRI for detection of pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- MRI-based qualitative, quantitative, and radiomics/deep learning methods for assessing treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Progress of MRI-based radiomics and deep learning for predicting the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- The Value of MRI-Based Radiomics in Predicting the Pathological Nodal Status of Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Tuning vision foundation models for rectal cancer segmentation from CT scans.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Radiomic Analysis of Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Aortic Atherosclerosis in Rabbits.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Robustness of textural analysis features in quantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Reliability of rectal MRI radiomic features: Comparing rectal MRI radiomic features across reader expertise levels, image segmentation technique, and timing of rectal MRI in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.European journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for response prediction and personalisation in radiation oncology.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- Exploring artificial intelligence for differentiating early syphilis from other skin lesions: a pilot study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Impact of artificial intelligence-based and traditional image preprocessing and resampling on MRI-based radiomics for classification of papillary thyroid carcinoma.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- The prognostic role of MRI-based radiomics in tongue carcinoma: a multicentric validation study.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Can Pretreatment MRI and Planning CT Radiomics Improve Prediction of Complete Pathological Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment?Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Radiomics and Deep Features: Robust Classification of Brain Hemorrhages and Reproducibility Analysis Using a 3D Autoencoder Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Radiomics for residual tumour detection and prognosis in newly diagnosed glioblastoma based on postoperative [Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Computed Tomography Scan and Clinical-based Complete Response Prediction in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Machine Learning Approach.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2024Article
- The role of superior hemorrhoidal vein ectasia in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- The importance of planning CT-based imaging features for machine learning-based prediction of pain response.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomics analyses commonly apply imaging features of different complexity for the prediction of the endpoint of interest. However, the prognostic value of each feature class is generally unclear. Furthermore, many radiomics models lack independent external validation that is decisive for their clinical application. Therefore, in this manuscript we present two complementary studies. In our modelling study, we developed and validated different radiomics signatures for outcome prediction after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on computed tomography (CT) and T2-weighted (T2w) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets of 4 independent institutions (training: 122, validation 68 patients). We compared different feature classes extracted from the gross tumour volume for the prognosis of tumour response and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM): morphological and first order (MFO) features, second order texture (SOT) features, and Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) transformed intensity features. Analyses were performed for CT and MRI separately and combined. Model performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and the concordance index (CI) for tumour response and FFDM, respectively. Overall, intensity features of LoG transformed CT and MR imaging combined with clinical T stage (cT) showed the best performance for tumour response prediction, while SOT features showed good performance for FFDM in independent validation (AUC = 0.70, CI = 0.69). In our external validation study, we aimed to validate previously published radiomics signatures on our multicentre cohort. We identified relevant publications on comparable patient datasets through a literature search and applied the reported radiomics models to our dataset. Only one of the identified studies could be validated, indicating an overall lack of reproducibility and the need of further standardization of radiomics before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.