ArticleScientific data2022
A focus groups study on data sharing and research data management.
Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconciling global collaboration and data sovereignty in neuroscience.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Embedding FAIR Data Practices in Shared Core Resource Facilities.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026Review
- What helps and hinders reproducible research? Researchers' perspectives from a cross-disciplinary interview study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Making human derived data FAIR: feedback from NCI office of data sharing workshop.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.Experimental neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities.eLife · 2024Article
- Investigating the Roles and Responsibilities of Institutional Signing Officials After Data Sharing Policy Reform for Federally Funded Research in the United States: National Survey.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Indifferent minds, broken system: a critical examination of mental health care provision for Spain's incarcerated population with serious mental illnesses.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- The coming decade of digital brain research: A vision for neuroscience at the intersection of technology and computing.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- COLLAGENE enables privacy-aware federated and collaborative genomic data analysis.Genome biology · 2023Article
- A focus groups study on data sharing and research data management.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Data platforms for open life sciences-A systematic analysis of management instruments.PloS one · 2022Article
- Data sharing and data governance in sub-Saharan Africa: Perspectives from researchers and scientists engaged in data-intensive research.South African journal of scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data sharing can accelerate scientific discovery while increasing return on investment beyond the researcher or group that produced them. Data repositories enable data sharing and preservation over the long term, but little is known about scientists' perceptions of them and their perspectives on data management and sharing practices. Using focus groups with scientists from five disciplines (atmospheric and earth science, computer science, chemistry, ecology, and neuroscience), we asked questions about data management to lead into a discussion of what features they think are necessary to include in data repository systems and services to help them implement the data sharing and preservation parts of their data management plans. Participants identified metadata quality control and training as problem areas in data management. Additionally, participants discussed several desired repository features, including: metadata control, data traceability, security, stable infrastructure, and data use restrictions. We present their desired repository features as a rubric for the research community to encourage repository utilization. Future directions for research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.